What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rogers future.

beerboy

Juniors
Messages
562
im a fan of both codes
played rugby for 9 years still do
i enjoy playing rugby than league
but prefer to watch and support league
while rugby will pull out an awesome game once in a while, league is way more consistanly better to watch, rather than 50/50 chane of an entertaining union game
 
Messages
4,792
At one stage I watched a lot of Rugby. Club Rugby, Test Rugby (1991 world cup).
I watched a lot the Waratahs in Rogers first year of Super 12. There were occassional outbreaks of good play in these games that were moderately entertaining.

However, I tuned out from the recent world cup. The world cup was some of the most boring, slow as grass growing sport, I have ever seen. As usual Biritish dominance of any sport is based on conservative tactics.

Good luck to Rogers and Tuquiri. I just think that running outside backs are watsed in Union, particularly at Test level, where boring jerks like Wilkinson spend hours kicking, and forwards roll down the field in interminable rolling malls.

What Union needs is a player like Mark Ella, who can tear apart the yawn inducing British with brilliant attacking play. I think there should be only 2 points for penalty goals, 1 point for field goals, to encourage more try scoring.
 
Messages
1,147
Im not one to not watch union if nothing else is on but league kicks it. The only real thing which really ticks me off bout union is how they kick for goal always. 40m out, kick for goal. 30m out, kick for goal. Excitement is in try scoring, not in some person kicking goals from rediculous distances. Yes Wilkinson has talent, but it doesnt make for good entertainment.
 

Alan Shore

First Grade
Messages
9,390
Sheros los Deros said:
At one stage I watched a lot of Rugby. Club Rugby, Test Rugby (1991 world cup).
I watched a lot the Waratahs in Rogers first year of Super 12. There were occassional outbreaks of good play in these games that were moderately entertaining.

However, I tuned out from the recent world cup. The world cup was some of the most boring, slow as grass growing sport, I have ever seen. As usual Biritish dominance of any sport is based on conservative tactics.

Good luck to Rogers and Tuquiri. I just think that running outside backs are watsed in Union, particularly at Test level, where boring jerks like Wilkinson spend hours kicking, and forwards roll down the field in interminable rolling malls.

What Union needs is a player like Mark Ella, who can tear apart the yawn inducing British with brilliant attacking play. I think there should be only 2 points for penalty goals, 1 point for field goals, to encourage more try scoring.

That game which encourages try scoring is called rugby league :D
 

Mr Angry

Not a Referee
Messages
51,816
newman said:
Look, angry. I aint no union supporter
Great start, then you must be a Sharks supporter. :clap:
newman said:
and I sure as hell aint wearing a tweed jacket.
You've won me over. :alcho:
newman said:
Despite this, I cant deny the fact that for the RWC final, the majority of the nation was interested, not to mention the majority of England. Most of em were downright enthralled. Even non-sports fans. I cant remember a league game ever doing this. When you talk about scale, leaugue just cant match that, yet.
The RWC was a great event no dispute.
The final being close gave it excitement yes. I watched the final, I watched a lot of it. I gave it a go.
The conclusion was
1. People love an event. Only the diehards bet the week following the Melbourne cup.
2. Australia can put on an event.
3. Kicking is the most important thing.
4. What a waste of skillful ball runners and tacklers.
5. 15 on the field is too many when played at the highest level.
6. When in doubt kick.
7. A winger touches the ball f**k all, and usually kicks it!
8. A 70 - 8 score line with some tries is a better spectacle than a 12-6 scoreline (all scored from kicks naturally)
9. Stop, Start, Stop, Start, Stop, Start, Stop, Start, Stop blowing the whistle.
10. I see why Union ranks a distant third to RL and AFL in this country. It's a scrappy game of consistant disputed possession, decided by the team with the best kicker.
11. The English won it, it must be crap.
newman said:
A game, of that scale, being that close, would be the highlight of any players career.
I thought the win against the All Blacks was the highlight myself.
If you captured all the film of when Matt actually has the ball in hand for his entire career in union, it would be a 10 min package, 5 mins of him kicking the ball.

newman said:
Can you see my point that he may lack motivation to go back down the ladder of achievement and play NRL for the Sharks?
:lol: Interesting view, lets hope we win a premiership without him. If coming runner-up in the RWC side, or those awe inspiring Waratahs games keep him challenged, I am happy for him. Easy money.

newman said:
I hope like hell he does. I really do, but I honestly cant see him busting his nuts to do so.
Mate as I say he can stay where he is, I want hungry players seeking the grail. Matt is all class but only welcome back, as long as we do not pay through the nose, he would be soft after all that standing around.

But here are the facts.
Matt said he wanted to be closer to the action, he was bored on the wing. Fair enough. I contend to you he sees a lot less action in union.
He also went for a different challenge. I contend any SoO standard league back would make the wallabies, that was a given not a challenge.
Matt was a better match in Union than Wendell and Lote because he can kick.
He went for the pay also.
He is perfectly entitled to do so. I perfectly entitled to remember.
Like his father before him, we will survive without him. Sludge sort and received redemption.
Sludge junior remains a union player.

Schooner Of New said:
Atleast you said for ' For Me '.That is your opinion and your choice.
Mate this disclaimer is just for you.
*Said really really fast*
On the left is my NIC, everything you see typed next to that NIC is ' For Me ' in that I typed it, it is of my opinion.
I am the official spokesmen for the Commonwealth of Angriness Population: 1 - me. No-one else.


I dislike union a lot, because I see a lot talent wasted- except the short fat useless guys. You are perfectly entitled to like what I see as crap.
see disclaimer.

Want to talk about soccer? ;-)
 

lolesi

First Grade
Messages
7,148
beerboy said:
im a fan of both codes
played rugby for 9 years still do
i enjoy playing rugby than league
but prefer to watch and support league
while rugby will pull out an awesome game once in a while, league is way more consistanly better to watch, rather than 50/50 chane of an entertaining union game

I am the same, love both codes, but id rather play league anyday, but im with union atm and its treating me well, give me what i have at union with league and ill be there in a flash
 

lolesi

First Grade
Messages
7,148
coolumsharkie said:
give me what i have at union with league and ill be there in a flash

Which is?

Firstly an oppurtunity, souths gave me a go, with league cause i played with a team which never featured in the semis i feel i never got a go, played abit of mathews cup but didnt make the final cut, though half the time they where playing me in positions i dont even play, was a waste of my time.
The medical staff is awsome there ( im sure sharks is also ) i recently got injured and they paid for anything from a x-ray to a bone scan, gym, shirt, gear etc.
They treat me very well there, where as this time i came from again not so a crash hot team, but they did not care, they judge me on my ability, and played me where i wanted to play.
 

Latest posts

Top