What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Roosters Lower Grades Merge with Newtown

hrundi99

First Grade
Messages
8,417
Rexxy said:
I wish I had enough money to buy airtime to put my own opinions forward.

I can hear radios/tvs switching off from Tassie to Townsville.

Chill Rex, your team'll probably win the GF this year.
 
Messages
3,986
Another bit of irony is on day 1 in the NSWRL premiership in 1908 they played each other with the Roosters winning 32-16.
 

Rexxy

Coach
Messages
10,692
they were over the cap.

Southern Rooster said:
Another bit of irony is on day 1 in the NSWRL premiership in 1908 they played each other with the Roosters winning 32-16.
 
Messages
42,661
Rammo said:
Newtown is still more of a footy club than the Wests Tigers are.

You follow Canterbury yet you feel that your opinion on this matter carries weight?

Oasis...

Coffs...

Bomb...

Salary Cap....

Need I go on?
 
Messages
42,661
hrundi99 said:
Why are you so infatuated?

Here's a tip. We've also had "relationships" with Souths and the Warriors.

Scandalous!

pfft, a fight is a fight, like I care why and who with.

So, you've had "relationships" with the Warriors, Souths, Cronulla and now the Roosters.

That tends to lend weight to my theory that the Jets are a whore club doesn't it?

I just hope the Roosters swallow...
 

Jeffles

Bench
Messages
3,412
Glad to see EA doesn't let facts get in the way of a good story.

Newtown are not a whore club. Each time a feeder arrangement - which by the way is much less a partnership than your merged scum - has ended, it has been the fault of another club.

Warriors - changed owners. The new owners wanted to keep their reggies in NZ.

Souths - Souths Juniors funded their own team in the Jim Beam Cup with a view to being Souiths PL team (which they are now). As a result the Juniors asked the Seniors to end the Newtown deal. The Juniors had the threat of funding withdrawal hanging over the head of the Juniors.

Cronulla - it was only ever a one year deal and the 2006 deal Cronulla wanted was a big departure from the current deal, one that Newtown could not deal with financially or philisophically.

Next year we will still be known as Newtown Jets. NO NAME CHANGE, NO MERGER.
 

Dr Crane

Live Update Team
Messages
19,531
Good to see Big League taking a totally reverse attitude to the Newtown-Cronulla they had a few weeks ago, now calling them the Newtown Jets.
 
Messages
42,661
Jeffles said:
Glad to see EA doesn't let facts get in the way of a good story.

Facts?

Newtown are a whore club.

Convince me otherwise.

Jeffles said:
Newtown are not a whore club.

Yeah, they are. They're hanging their arse over the balcony waiting for someone to slot a fiver into the crack.

The Roosters are the latest "client".

Jeffles said:
Each time a feeder arrangement - which by the way is much less a partnership than your merged scum - has ended, it has been the fault of another club.

See, that's why I laid the bait, so you and that other wankstain that spent all that time in our forum calling us merged scum would come out to play.

We were married, you sold your arse to the highest bidder.

That makes us an equal partner and you a whore.

If we did a Newtown, we'd be a small Magpie symbol on the back of Canterbury's jersey.

Jeffles said:
Warriors - changed owners. The new owners wanted to keep their reggies in NZ.

They were smart.

Jeffles said:
Souths - Souths Juniors funded their own team in the Jim Beam Cup with a view to being Souiths PL team (which they are now). As a result the Juniors asked the Seniors to end the Newtown deal. The Juniors had the threat of funding withdrawal hanging over the head of the Juniors.

So one of your Johns got married.

Boo hoo.

Jeffles said:
Cronulla - it was only ever a one year deal and the 2006 deal Cronulla wanted was a big departure from the current deal, one that Newtown could not deal with financially or philisophically.

Philisophically?

What that f**k is that bullsh*t?

Your benefactor spits the dummy once every few years and threatens to join the Union S12 comp with a team based in Gosford.

Philisophical my arse.

And who cares about your "deal" with Cronulla, your club sells its soul regularly.

Jeffles said:
Next year we will still be known as Newtown Jets. NO NAME CHANGE, NO MERGER.

Newtown Jets aka Roosters PL team.

Whatever you think, that is the reality. Same as you are the Newtown Jets aka Cronulla's PL side this year.

W H O R E.
 

Jeffles

Bench
Messages
3,412
1) "Philisophically" means there were some parts of the agreement - that were not financial matters - that Newtown could not agree with. I'm not going to tell you what they were because it is none of your business.

2) Singo is not our "benefactor". He is our Patron which is an honourary position. Just like John Howard is not a benefactor for the Dragons. Singo is just a high profile supporter.

3) Just because a club seeks an improved financial position does not make it a whore. Again I am forced to bring up Wests Tigers. I won't call them whores for moving home ground for financial reasons. Nor did I call them whores when Balmain gave Ryde half of its PL side. A club is not a whore for looking after its interests. A whore would sell its soul. Newtown still has its identity, more than I can say for other clubs.
 
Messages
42,661
Jeffles said:
1) "Philisophically" means there were some parts of the agreement - that were not financial matters - that Newtown could not agree with. I'm not going to tell you what they were because it is none of your business.

i.e. They don't exist.

You don't make a written agreement with a whore, you just bang her.

Jeffles said:
2) Singo is not our "benefactor". He is our Patron which is an honourary position. Just like John Howard is not a benefactor for the Dragons. Singo is just a high profile supporter.

So he hasn't any money invested in Newtown?

Singo is a boofhead. He was useful to the Jets 25 years ago, now he's a liabuility whether he's your benefactor, patron or dishwasher.

Jeffles said:
3) Just because a club seeks an improved financial position does not make it a whore. Again I am forced to bring up Wests Tigers. I won't call them whores for moving home ground for financial reasons. Nor did I call them whores when Balmain gave Ryde half of its PL side. A club is not a whore for looking after its interests. A whore would sell its soul. Newtown still has its identity, more than I can say for other clubs.

bullsh*t.

You're as bad as the teams you happily call merged scum. Teams that merged to save themselves from becoming like Newtown.

I'd rather merge with Manly than become Newtown.

Newtown, the Roosters Premier League team.
 

Lego_Man

First Grade
Messages
5,071
Everlovin' Antichrist said:
I'd rather merge with Manly than become Newtown.


Please think about that again...this time carefully consider your answer before typing it down...

:lol:
 

Jeffles

Bench
Messages
3,412
Lego_Man said:
Please think about that again...this time carefully consider your answer before typing it down...

:lol:
i.e. They don't exist.

No they do exist - but its none of your business.

So he hasn't any money invested in Newtown?

Singo is a boofhead. He was useful to the Jets 25 years ago, now he's a liabuility whether he's your benefactor, patron or dishwasher.

You shouldn't comment on what you know nothing about. Singo helped Wests limp along until their Leagues Club got into gear and Balmain came along. I wouldn't be knocking him.

You're as bad as the teams you happily call merged scum. Teams that merged to save themselves from becoming like Newtown.

I disagree. What do Wests have to show for themselves now? A club that everyone calls the Tigers, a club that looks to Pearce, Sironen and Elias instread of Donnelly, Raudonikis and Boyd when it talks about its "Legends" and a club that is proud to boast the "tradition" of playing at Leichhardt and not Campbelltown.

Wests Magpies fans are in the same boat as Newtown fans. Their ownership of the Wests Tigers is illusory. WT are Balmain in disguise.
 
Messages
60
Big Mick © said:
Oh great

Now Politis AND Singleton.

Roosters can buy an even better team now.

The funny thing is, Singleton HATES the Roosters with a passion. Only last year he described them as a "club that no one cares about".

How embarrassing for him!
 

brooksy19

Bench
Messages
3,683
Jeffles said:
I disagree. What do Wests have to show for themselves now? A club that everyone calls the Tigers, a club that looks to Pearce, Sironen and Elias instread of Donnelly, Raudonikis and Boyd when it talks about its "Legends" and a club that is proud to boast the "tradition" of playing at Leichhardt and not Campbelltown.

Wests Magpies fans are in the same boat as Newtown fans. Their ownership of the Wests Tigers is illusory. WT are Balmain in disguise.

As a long time Balmain fan, Jeffles, go and get f**ked.
 

Jeffles

Bench
Messages
3,412
Brooksy, I'm not saying it's all peachy for Balmain. It certainly isn't and I know a lot of Balmain fans that have explained to me why it isn't. I was just trying to say that Balmain got the better of the deal and I was just using that argument to show the hypocrisy of EA's comments.
 

MrSharky

Juniors
Messages
1,933
weasel said:
Smart move by the Jets, were never gonna win anything in an association with the Sharks. Also, I'd been planning to get one of those retro newtown jerseys last year, until their partnership with Cronulla was announced, now I can put it back on the agenda without feeling dirty.

... *looks at PL Ladder*...


MORON! :roll:


P.S. Newtown is like the bogun capital of the world... should go with the Roosters well...

:cool:
 

ozzie

Bench
Messages
4,704
Everlovin' Antichrist said:
aka the Newtown Eastern Suburbs Sydney Henson Jet Sharks....

You're battling to understand why someone would consider your club a whore?

Gimme a break, your club is a whore. Your club is the Heidi Fleiss of Australian Rugby League.

I can just see the weeks before the Roosters deal ends:

Newtown : "Hi there Souths you big hunka Footy Club..."

does this mean that St George was a Pimp - and fancy the scum merge only got $m's to St George to keep them afloat - ask yourself - where would they be without Illawarra - stuffed is the term I can think of.. All that remains of Illawarra is some soxs. You have no right to call anyone whores
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
157,805
I can just imagine the discussion in the baord room

somthing like..................

Kerry, we need a reserve grade team

No, problems Nick, we'll just buy one, money is not object
 

BWNB

First Grade
Messages
8,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by weasel
Smart move by the Jets, were never gonna win anything in an association with the Sharks. Also, I'd been planning to get one of those retro newtown jerseys last year, until their partnership with Cronulla was announced, now I can put it back on the agenda without feeling dirty.

before you go on with crap like that think about what you are saying makes no sense does it?
 
Top