Su'a should be getting more than a 2 week suspension. Just imagine if that hit was put on Thruston or Slater. I think he would be getting a longer suspension if it was one of those 2.Bronco Jaydn Su’a could miss two matches over sickening hit on Dragons prop Paul Vaughan
DAVID CAMPBELL, The Daily Telegraph
March 9, 2018 12:02pm
BRONCOS young gun Jaydn Su’a has been charged by the NRL judiciary for his cheap shot on Dragons prop Paul Vaughan in last night’s season opener.
Vaughan was left vomiting on the field after Su’a shoulder charged the Red V big man off the ball in the 76th minute of the Dragons 34-12 win.
Vaughan was approaching the Broncos defensive line expecting a pass from Ben Hunt when the Dragons halfback opted to go elsewhere.
Paul Vaughan vomits on the field after being shoulder charged.
Vaughan was watching the ball as he eased off his run and was completely blindsided when Su’a dropped his shoulder right into the middle of Vaughan’s chest.
Vaughan vomited on the field before staggering to the sideline and vomiting again.
Su’a and the Broncos must challenge — and beat — the judiciary’s grade one charge otherwise he could miss up to two matches.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/s...n/news-story/9258475f4c76c4f7eaaf6863d23cb7ac
As far as I'm concerned, if you continue to get wins like that, you can celebrate however the f**k you want.After a win, I think it’s best to jerk Gareth all over my grinning face in the Presser.
It staves off complacency
I think it’s limited Wayne and Bellyache’s success, not doing it.
It’s on fox, DQ !
While your there, can ya order me double gin & tonic?
Thanks in advance.
Su'a should be getting more than a 2 week suspension. Just imagine if that hit was put on Thruston or Slater. I think he would be getting a longer suspension if it was one of those 2.
I hope Aitken gets injured and Lomax gets the opportunity to show us how good he is.
FFI hope Aitken gets injured and Lomax gets the opportunity to show us how good he is.
Aitken had had 3 years to impress me and develop a passing game. In his first year, I hoped that he would develop his game, but he has failed to do so. I have seen enough of him and don't want him in the centres for us. I also do not want him blocking the path of one of our best prospects that we have had in a very long time, ie Lomax. Our coaching staff should have recognised his deficiencies and told him to develop his game in reserve grade. He has had one good game and received a lot of praise from Gould, Vautin and co, with Vautin even suggesting that Aitken could be an origin player. We had a poll on this site about who should be picked Aitken or Mann and the poll is 98 Mann, 7 Aitken, with Aitken receiving at least 3 more votes, since Thursday night. But now everyone has turned their attention to Lafai and forgot about Aitken. Neither are good enough. I would not have either of them in my first grade team and I am not going to change my mind about Aitken because he received praise for Gould and Vautin. The try he scored was classic Aitken HOG. He should have passed the ball to an unmarked Nightingale, but he won't pass the ball, just like he didn't for most of his career. Many other on this site have continually harped on about Aitken defensive deficiencies, but everyone appears to have forgotten about that too. I haven't.FF
This is not your best work and in fact it is appalling.
The limitations of our coaching staff and selection are not as a result of anything Aitken has or hasn't done.
You should in fact wish that sectors have an epiphany and hope that the BOD follow not long after.
Much better scenario than wishing ill will on a young player.
Aitken had had 3 years to impress me and develop a passing game. In his first year, I hoped that he would develop his game, but he has failed to do so. I have seen enough of him and don't want him in the centres for us. I also do not want him blocking the path of one of our best prospects that we have had in a very long time, ie Lomax. Our coaching staff should have recognised his deficiencies and told him to develop his game in reserve grade. He has had one good game and received a lot of praise from Gould, Vautin and co, with Vautin even suggesting that Aitken could be an origin player. We had a poll on this site about who should be picked Aitken or Mann and the poll is 98 Mann, 7 Aitken, with Aitken receiving a at least 3 more votes, since Thursday night. But now everyone has turned their attention to Lafai and forgot about Aitken. Neither are good enough. I would not have either of them in my first grade team and I am not going to change my mind about Aitken because he received praise for Gould and Vautin. The try he scored was classic Aitken HOG. He should have passed the ball to an unmarked Nightingale, but he won't pass the ball, just like he didn't for most of his career. Many other on this site have continually harped on about Aitken defensive deficiencies, but everyone appears to have forgotten about that too. I haven't.
I fully expected many fans on this site to dislike my comment, but I don't care. I am sticking to my guns. Aitken isn't a centre and never was a centre. He is a powerful runner of the football and looks good when a defensive like is at six's and seven's and is on the back foot, like on Thursday night. If you all can be bothered to look up his highlight reel on youtube, you will see that he is basically a one trick pony. He scores tries from close range, by tucking the ball under his arm and going for the try line.
Just imagine if we get a start like we did to last year's premiership, but then do not fall away and Lafai starts to produce what he was at the beginning of last year. Lomax and even Herbert will stay in reserve grade and won't get the opportunity to show us how good they are. That could eventually lead to Lomax leaving because we have two shit centres blocking his path.
I actually think McDonald would make a better centre than Aitken too. I think centre is McDonald's natural position. Centre is not Aitken's natural position.
And you can not keep blaming the coach and coaching staff for players deficiencies. The player in question must be accountable for their own deficiencies. I do blame the coach for still picking him though.
I don't know what BOD stands for either.
I am not trying to dig myself out of it. I know what I said and expected criticism for it.I'm afraid there's no digging yourself out of that tasteless comment, particularly when you are masquerading as a dragons legend...
Board of directors in this instance.BOD = benefit of the doubt
Aitken had had 3 years to impress me and develop a passing game. In his first year, I hoped that he would develop his game, but he has failed to do so. I have seen enough of him and don't want him in the centres for us. I also do not want him blocking the path of one of our best prospects that we have had in a very long time, ie Lomax. Our coaching staff should have recognised his deficiencies and told him to develop his game in reserve grade. He has had one good game and received a lot of praise from Gould, Vautin and co, with Vautin even suggesting that Aitken could be an origin player. We had a poll on this site about who should be picked Aitken or Mann and the poll is 98 Mann, 7 Aitken, with Aitken receiving a at least 3 more votes, since Thursday night. But now everyone has turned their attention to Lafai and forgot about Aitken. Neither are good enough. I would not have either of them in my first grade team and I am not going to change my mind about Aitken because he received praise for Gould and Vautin. The try he scored was classic Aitken HOG. He should have passed the ball to an unmarked Nightingale, but he won't pass the ball, just like he didn't for most of his career. Many other on this site have continually harped on about Aitken defensive deficiencies, but everyone appears to have forgotten about that too. I haven't.
I fully expected many fans on this site to dislike my comment and criticize me for it, but I don't care. I am sticking to my guns. Aitken isn't a centre and never was a centre. He is a powerful runner of the football and looks good when a defensive like is at six's and seven's and is on the back foot, like on Thursday night. If you all can be bothered to look up his highlight reel on youtube, you will see that he is basically a one trick pony. He scores tries from close range, by tucking the ball under his arm and going for the try line. If the coach keeps selecting him, then the only way that another player will take his position if for him to get injured.
Just imagine if we get a start like we did to last year's premiership, but then do not fall away and Lafai starts to produce what he was at the beginning of last year. Lomax and even Herbert will stay in reserve grade and won't get the opportunity to show us how good they are. That could eventually lead to Lomax leaving because we have two shit centres blocking his path.
I actually think McDonald would make a better centre than Aitken too. I think centre is McDonald's natural position. Centre is not Aitken's natural position.
And you can not keep blaming the coach and coaching staff for players deficiencies. The player in question must be accountable for their own deficiencies. I do blame the coach for still picking him though.
I don't know what BOD stands for either.
FF, I suspect your assessment of Aitken is spot on. I’d even say it is unlikely that he will be dropped unless injured.I will also add that the only way that I can see Aitken not being selected for the next 12 games or so, is if he gets injured. I don't want him in our team at centre. If he was playing for another club and they kept picking him at centre, I would not give a shit and be laughing at the club for picking him there.
I can also word it that the only way, Aitken won't get picked is for him to get injured. I don't want him picked in the team.
One swallow doesn't make a summer.