truthslayer
Juniors
- Messages
- 343
Tom burgess outstanding,
Really stepped up this year in the absence of Sam. Probably Souths best player so far.Tom burgess outstanding,
Got to be the worse team in the NRL have Souths when attacking in opposition 20. Just bash and barge and don’t have anymore ideas.
That's a crazy call, but you're right. I've said it before and I'll say it again - I'll be glad to see the back of bennett. Hoping be leaves a year early and JD can breath new life into Souths attack.Nothing different really to what I've said in previous weeks.
Wayne Bennett has taken this team backwards. He's paid a lot of money and is unable to play to the strengths of the spine. Adam Reynolds ran for more metres than Damien Cook did tonight!
Dean Pay got more out Canterbury than what Bennett is able to get out of Souths.
The problem isn't personnel, it's the instructions they're getting during the week.
Crocker at worst a professional foul,,,,,,, maybe worth looking at a penalty try,,,,, but doubtful.
We missed Johnson ,,,,,, no spark in attack. 2 nd game winger,, the other winger solid but slower than me goes to fullback,,,second rower at centre always going be a hard one to win. Two extremely lucky tries off kicks but we also blew too many chances. Inside the 20 attack was appalling . Sele didn't seem to get many minutes??.
Sorry I beg to differ.
He came from an offside position to dive on the ball denying any souths player a chance of grounding the ball,,,,,, the fact that he didn't play at a player doesn't seem to me to be relevant. However I'm not sure of the actual rule. It seems however if you do something illegal to stop a try scoring opportunity then that would be a professional foul.
Every player had an opportunity to dive onto the ball. He was just the first to react from a position that while it was offside, i doubt he intentionally placed himself there for that reason. The ball came out in the tackle and he did what any other defensive player would've done without a second thought.
He deliberately dove on the ball, he wasn't deliberately offside.
Are you saying he was accidently offside. I agree with Moses - Croker dove on the ball and thereby negated any onside player from scoring - thats a professional foul at the very least which earns a sinbinning.
The penalty wasn't for diving on the ball. Every player is entitled to dive on the ball. The penalty was for the position he was in when the ball came out, which was accidental.
A professional foul is a deliberate act to deny the opposition an advantage. Accidental offside isn't deliberate.
Had it happened in the in-goal, it wouldn't have even been a penalty.
If that's a professional foul then so is every other indescretion conceded inside the defensive 20.
If the roles were reversed and it was a Rabbitoh we wouldn't even be having this conversation. Nobody would've brought it up.
I think we must be talking about two different events,. what I saw was a Raiders player coming from an offside position, diving on a ball knocked forward by another Raiders player who knocked it forward near his own try line - that's not accidental and had he not dove on the ball the adjacent Souths guy would have retrieved the ball and quite possible scored.
That's automatic sin binning - had it have been a Rabbitoh player diving on the ball I would expect the player to be sin binned.
All that was necessary, from my point of view, was for the video ref to judge if the Souths guy would have scored, which I felt he would have.
He is not playing well at all,if he dosrnt improve 100% weve wasyed 800kI hope Jai Arrow's taking note of our gameplan.
Might need to spend the offseason running at brickwalls while receiving a pass.