Some observations but preface comments that roosters too good at the end:
- Dufty did use his high end speed to back up Rava and catch a fair pass to score early in the match. Who else has looked at this and thought ‘where is the forward pass’. Most of those type of trys find the ball travels flat or forward over the ground. Didn’t rate a mention? by commentators; nice early big call favour of the chooks.
- Two loose carriers by the chooks forwards holding the ball one handed in twisty wrist motion for off load. Our guys simply locked the ball, no stripping. First one a no brainer to us but bunker said’inconclusive therefore chooks keep their challenge’. Joke. That allowed Taukeaiho to claim a strip in the same circumstances when he spilt a loose carry and surprise the bunker gave a penalty against us.Joke.
- Yes, Rava was very clumsy trying to jump catch a high ball and ended up landing on Teddy’s back. Rava was penalised. But Tupou has a high catch technique that involves jumping and cannoning into the opposition players body knee 1st before catching the ball. The hit on Rava was a terrible foul in my opinion. No mention at all by any commentator.
- Tupou’s 1 st try was off a forward pass from walker followed by the dodgy Harlem globe trotters put down. No commentato mentioned the slappy bouncing non grounding?. The bunker didn’t even slow it down.
- Piggy back penalties in 2 half sure helped chooks to get in range twice.
At the end of the day, we don’t have the cattle. Slow centres and wingers ( granted Rava is strong with some dash) and forwards who don’t eat metres. The one forward with a genuine strong carry was Paul V and he is gone.
Dragons please buy quality fast centres who can bust tackles.
Agree with some of your comments.
The bunker going inconclusive is a joke. Never a stripping motion and they should have lost their challenge. The second one was basically identical but they overturned the refs decision and gave a penalty. The Dragon's had just hit the lead and had momentum and the Rooster's were struggling. That killed us and we know that we are not a team that is able to hold out against adversity. Instead of 40m or so out from their line with 6 tackles, we are suddenly defending. It's these dodgy decisions that the top teams get. Basically the bunker has overruled the ref twice for not agreeing with the strip on both occasions and somehow the Rooster's still had their challenge at the end of both the calls. A loss to the Rooster's in this game would have potentially meant them missing the top 4, I am sure we can all join the dots here.
I was watching the game with my young son and we both said the pass from Walker to Tupou was forward. He passes it from about 2 netres out yet Tupou had to stretch and was basically on the line when he caught it. And there was certainly no hint of the ball going backwards from the hands but floating forward due to Walker traveling at speed.
Don't really have an issue with Tupou jumping into Rava. I have more of an issue with Lomax not showing urgency and getting into position to block Tupou's run at the ball. A good centre would have realised that Tupou was the only one who had a play at it so it was an easy decision of what he had to do. It's not as if there were multiple chasers. It was obvious that any winger would have had difficulty catching the ball facing the sun so Lomax should have helped him.