BLM01
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,912
Plenty?. I would say all.Tigers fans on Facebook blaming the ref's
They got plenty of good calls
Plenty?. I would say all.Tigers fans on Facebook blaming the ref's
They got plenty of good calls
What was he supposed to do! roll out the red carpet.How come it wasn't a penalty try to the Tigers - Lomax tackling the Tigers player in mid air?
Probably because he didn't tackle the Tigers player in mid air - he contested a kick, which he was beaten to. Afterwards he can't disappear, can he? Even the Fox commentary team - who death-ride Saints from go to whoa - were of the opinion that it shouldn't have been a penalty. Also, he didn't deny the Tigers player a try-scoring opportunity.How come it wasn't a penalty try to the Tigers - Lomax tackling the Tigers player in mid air?
I cant believe this troll is allowed on here. Surely poor losers from the Rorters forum should be banned after making so many stupid comments on our forum. Hey stalin-the toilets need cleaning and with your commentary record youre the perfect person to do it. While you're there how about you flush yourself back to the Rorters forum. Cause no-one here wants to read your crap anymoreHow come it wasn't a penalty try to the Tigers - Lomax tackling the Tigers player in mid air?
It is the rule though. It is Quite Dangerous and fair enough to be penalisedWhat was he supposed to do! roll out the red carpet.
Dumb rule. In goal as long as it is not a dangerous tackle it should never be a penalty.
Nrl has gone soft
Ho Hum another keyboard hero- Lucky school is back so you can talk to those your own age instead of going onto non kiddy sites and annoying the adults.I cant believe this troll is allowed on here. Surely poor losers from the Rorters forum should be banned after making so many stupid comments on our forum. Hey stalin-the toilets need cleaning and with your commentary record youre the perfect person to do it. While you're there how about you flush yourself back to the Rorters forum. Cause no-one here wants to read your crap anymore
was not Dangerous , your kidding yourself to call that tackle Dangerous , but it is still a dumb ruleIt is the rule though. It is Quite Dangerous and fair enough to be penalised
....How come it wasn't a penalty try to the Tigers - Lomax tackling the Tigers player in mid air?
Early days yet - They will power on and Victory will be oursSomebody's a little salty that their A class team is playing like shite.
No chance there is enough in that to be more than a penalty mate.
Lomax barely touches him and we got the win so move on.
Does he ever pass to fergaiMoses Suli...
18 carries for 190 meters and 85 post contact meters...
Just imagine the damage he could do if we could give him a little more time and space...
How come it wasn't a penalty try to the Tigers - Lomax tackling the Tigers player
Lomax was trying contest for the ball mid air.wonce contest was over he tackled the opposition player .Stalin go back to your rorting roosters.How come it wasn't a penalty try to the Tigers - Lomax tackling the Tigers player in mid air?