- Messages
- 62,358
Lawrence has been a revelation and proving what I said, that he would be our best back rower in a short period of time. I know that's not a big accomplishment, but his stats back up what we see on the field.
I've done a comparison with his other starting back row partner since he moved to the forwards
Lawrence 92 touches
Others 82 touches (Sironen 21, Lovett 61)
Lawrence 63 runs for 497 metres - 7.89 per run
Others 60 runs for 423 metres - 7.05 per run (Sironen 13 runs for 92 metres, Lovett 47 runs for 423 metres)
Tackle Breaks
Lawrence 4
Others 4 (Lovett 4)
Off Loads
Lawrence 3
Others 3 (Lovett 3)
Line Breaks
Lawrence 1
Others 0
Hit ups
Lawrence 35 for 313 metres - 8.94 metres her hit up
Others 42 for 313 metres - 7.45 metres per hit up (Sironen 11 for 82 metres, Lovett 31 hit ups for 231 metres)
Tackles
Lawrence 143 tackles made, 5 1 on 1 tackles, 3 ineffective, 4 missed - 95.33% effective
Others 173 tackles made, 7 1 on 1 tackles, 5 ineffective, 13 missed - 90.56% effective
Given Lovett is a defensive backrower, he has had one less game than Lawrence in the above stats, Lawrence is only 5 tackles behind Lovett, so he certainly isn't shirking responsibilities in defence.
But one thing the stats don't show is the great lines that Lawrence runs now. He hits them straight and hard and his pace which was a burden in the backs is proving to be an absolute asset in the forwards.
As his confidence in the role grows and he gets comfortable in the role, I expect him to really become a more than competent back rower, worthy of any NRL pack.
While this is great, it highlights a huge problem too.
If a centre can switch to the back row and start outperforming the natural back rowers we already have in just over a month, then those guys are nowhere near good enough.
This is the most pressing issue that needs to be rectified before anything else.
I've done a comparison with his other starting back row partner since he moved to the forwards
Lawrence 92 touches
Others 82 touches (Sironen 21, Lovett 61)
Lawrence 63 runs for 497 metres - 7.89 per run
Others 60 runs for 423 metres - 7.05 per run (Sironen 13 runs for 92 metres, Lovett 47 runs for 423 metres)
Tackle Breaks
Lawrence 4
Others 4 (Lovett 4)
Off Loads
Lawrence 3
Others 3 (Lovett 3)
Line Breaks
Lawrence 1
Others 0
Hit ups
Lawrence 35 for 313 metres - 8.94 metres her hit up
Others 42 for 313 metres - 7.45 metres per hit up (Sironen 11 for 82 metres, Lovett 31 hit ups for 231 metres)
Tackles
Lawrence 143 tackles made, 5 1 on 1 tackles, 3 ineffective, 4 missed - 95.33% effective
Others 173 tackles made, 7 1 on 1 tackles, 5 ineffective, 13 missed - 90.56% effective
Given Lovett is a defensive backrower, he has had one less game than Lawrence in the above stats, Lawrence is only 5 tackles behind Lovett, so he certainly isn't shirking responsibilities in defence.
But one thing the stats don't show is the great lines that Lawrence runs now. He hits them straight and hard and his pace which was a burden in the backs is proving to be an absolute asset in the forwards.
As his confidence in the role grows and he gets comfortable in the role, I expect him to really become a more than competent back rower, worthy of any NRL pack.
While this is great, it highlights a huge problem too.
If a centre can switch to the back row and start outperforming the natural back rowers we already have in just over a month, then those guys are nowhere near good enough.
This is the most pressing issue that needs to be rectified before anything else.