What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rugby Internationals 2014

shiznit

Coach
Messages
14,806
What the f**k was that... Was that ref on the take or something??

Unbelieveble... We would have won that game EASILY if that ref actually did his job...

Those 2 cards were disgraceful... No warnings... They weren't even in possible try scoring positions... Just straight yellow cards.

Then the arsehole didn't understand how a scrum worked... The Wallabies halfback was clearly delaying putting the ball in because the All Blacks first contact was too strong... That's disgraceful from the ref.

The only positive here is that the Bledisloe is safe for another 3 years... Because there's no way they will get close to us in NZ let alone at Eden Park next weekend... And next year is only 2 tests which the wallabies would have to win both of... Then 2016 it will be 2 games in NZ... So the next good chance they get will be 2017.
 

Horrie Is God

First Grade
Messages
8,073
4 goals each going by the Fox Sports News report..

Sounds like a game that'll bring the crowds back..

Rah..
 

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
What the f**k was that... Was that ref on the take or something??

Unbelieveble... We would have won that game EASILY if that ref actually did his job...

Those 2 cards were disgraceful... No warnings... They weren't even in possible try scoring positions... Just straight yellow cards.

Then the arsehole didn't understand how a scrum worked... The Wallabies halfback was clearly delaying putting the ball in because the All Blacks first contact was too strong... That's disgraceful from the ref.

The only positive here is that the Bledisloe is safe for another 3 years... Because there's no way they will get close to us in NZ let alone at Eden Park next weekend... And next year is only 2 tests which the wallabies would have to win both of... Then 2016 it will be 2 games in NZ... So the next good chance they get will be 2017.

Cards were both ordinary.

Scrum was straightforward though. How many warnings did the kiwi front row need? All unheeded. Don't cheat - how f**king hard is it? Thing is - the ref warned the kiwi front row that the next one would be a penalty, yet he still kept awarding free-kick / short-arm penalties.

Wallabies couldn't score when the AB's had only 14 on for 20 mins. Poor discipline and poor basics - pushed into touch at crucial times, attackers isolated, failing to call kicks, in front of the kicker. The mistakes just kept coming.
 

BODISGOD

Bench
Messages
3,604
The cards were justified.

Kiwis don't like that a ref actually pinged them for cynical penalties which should always be cards imo when in scoring zones. McCaw was great but at it as well. Australia played the football. New Zealand played the conditions and kicked and competed.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
The Wallabies would have almost scored in both those instances, professional fouls, cards. What is the issue. NZ are just surprised that their blatant infringements actually got pinned for once in a blue moon!
 

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
Cards would make sense if they were applied consistently. Those blatant infringements should be carded, but they usually aren't.
 

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
AB's just too good.

Wallabies basics were awful with mistake after mistake, but the AB's were on a different level. At least there was some redemption with a decent passage of play by the Aussies for about 10 minutes in the second half. Foley needs to start at 10 and probably Phipps at 9 as well.
 

hellteam

First Grade
Messages
6,536
White had a shocker, looks like he forgot how to pass, which is pretty crucial for a halfback...
 

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
The AB forwards got away with monstering him. He was dragged into rucks, grabbed, impeded. Phipps dealt with it much better. Difference is that he has the benefit of watching, working out how to counter what they were getting away with and then dealing with forwards who were knackered. I'd start him with Foley though.

For the last two tests AAC has been very quiet in attack. Unusual.
 

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
Our scrum also improved a lot when changes were made. We need to change the starters.
 

shiznit

Coach
Messages
14,806
That was better... Still annoyed that we let the foot off the throat at 44-6.

We were still pretty rusty... There's a few guys in that All Blacks squad who will be looking over there shoulder as we have some outstanding kids banging the door down in the ITM cup.

SBW will be back in a couple of months too... Which should shore up our midfield depth.
 

crocodile

Bench
Messages
3,551
AB's just too good.

Wallabies basics were awful with mistake after mistake, but the AB's were on a different level. At least there was some redemption with a decent passage of play by the Aussies for about 10 minutes in the second half. Foley needs to start at 10 and probably Phipps at 9 as well.

Foley and Phipps were a little better. Still just tinkering around the edges though. The game was lost in forwards.
 

Latest posts

Top