It's good news that more people are watching NRL on TV and attending games in such strong numbers.
Masters' analysis regarding NRL's rise in viewership and AFL's decline is reasonably accurate, but the most accurate thing he said was that it was not an apples for apples comparison.
He should have included that the Australian football had 200 games shown on TV (185 AFL games + 15 NAB Cup games). In comparison, the NRL had 268 games shown on TV including 201 NRL games, 10 rep games and 57 Toyota Cup games.
Seeing as rugby league has 68 more games on TV, I'd have thought having more viewers than Australian football would be a given.
.....of those 68....57 are Toyota cup....on Pay TV.....
* ARF has more free-to-air coverage
* ARF is on in all states and at favourable times in comparison to RL, and superleague would have damaged relationship with WA+SA and little has done to repair the damage.
* ARF has massive media advertising machine vs RL.
* ARF has a massive favourable/bias media support.
* ARF has more people going to games, hence live matches would lose that viewership.
* ARF has some local comps on TV, which should be added, but I'm sure if Toyota cup or other were on F-t-a TV there would be a greater following.
* RL - 1 of the 3 f-t-a games is the late 2nd friday night game, though in a QLD/NSW swap, it could do a lot better stand alone.
* RL - 1 of the Sat games is on late 9:30 on pay tv..though there is viewer choice....not sure about ARF.
* RL QLD Cup games to be added. (tks russ13)
* RL - Warriors are part of the comp so adding NZ figures (Pay and FTA) should boost figures quite nicely......and should always be included when talking numbers....
* RL - Would have a big following in PNG, decent following in UK and now US via Spike.
* RL - Noted that UK Super League is screened on CH9. (tks russ13)
* ARF games are longer.
*Sydney is Sydney....Melb..well.....
....anymore
Anyway, I would be pretty cocky about RL's future in the first meeting if I was on the NRL board for the new commission with those results.