This, I suspect, goes some way to explaining the popularity of rugby league in Australia and the industrial regions of New Zealand - they could identify with British teams because the tourists were people just like the mass of ordinary Australians and Kiwis.
So rugby league’s strength has always been about more than the thrilling spectacle on the pitch. At its heart was the principle that ordinary people should have the opportunity to develop their talents to their fullest extent.
I think this has been NRLs big problem since 2013...
Prior to that, when the game was being run on an the smell of an oil rag, the NRL had a kind of "we're all in it together" image.
But in the leadup to the 2013 TV deal, i think too much was made of the $s we would get. THere was an implicit promise (from Gallop mostly) that "everyone would get exactly what they wanted, just give it a few more years".
It was a great stalling tactic then (the promise of the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow to keep us from worrying about all of the cracks), but after we got the money and the game didnt do every wonderful thing we thought it could, i think a general feeling of disappointment has stuck to the NRL and the ARLC in particular. We were promised a silverbullet and we never got it.
I dont have the solution to this (it is easy to pick the problem and complain), but that disconection between the NRL with its millionaire players and fans reminicing about the "Good Ol' Days" is a problem that needs to be dealt with....