What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rugby league think tank

Inferno

Coach
Messages
18,448
NRL Continues to fight Grapple Tackle

Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 10:10 AM
The NRL is being urged to continue its campaign against the ‘grapple tackle’, receiving unanimous support for further measures to discourage the practice from an advisory group selected to discuss NRL rules today.
The group, made up of former players and coaches, referees, the RLPA and media commentators discussed ideas that will in turn be raised at the annual meeting of current coaches and players on November 20. The annual conference of club chief executives will follow on December 5 and 6.
Today’s meeting paid particular attention to the grapple tackle, the ‘dominant tackle’ call, the issue of multiple defenders in ‘upright tackles’, interchange rules, ‘sin-bin’ options, in-goal areas, video technology and the protection of kickers.
The area that sparked the most consistent agreement was the ‘grapple tackle’.
It was strongly recommended that any prolonged contact with the head or neck in a tackle should result in a penalty and a possible judiciary charge.
Where any incidental contact in these areas was made during the course of a tackle, there would be an onus on the defender to immediately release his hold.
Closely related to this was the current dominant tackle ruling in which the referee’s call of ‘dominant’ allows the defending team additional time to clear the tackle.
Today’s meeting recommended that referees no longer make such a call, although they should retain the ‘surrender’ call to prevent attacking players diving at the defence.
“The meeting covered almost five hours of robust discussion about the game,” NRL Chief Executive, Mr David Gallop, said today.
“The game is not in need of major changes but we should always be looking to make any improvements that we can.
“As we found today, in many ways you can start looking to make a change only to find that when you really examine every aspect you realise that the best outcome is already in place.
“Certainly today there were also some good ideas that we should pursue further and we will do that with the coaches and the players later this year as well as with the clubs and the boards that govern the game.”
The following is a summary of issues discussed:
Grapple tackle
  • - Any prolonged contact with the head or neck to be penalised.
  • - The onus is on a defender to immediately release his hold if any incidental contact occurs with the head or neck.
  • - A review of match review and judiciary procedures in relation to grapple tackles.
  • - Eliminate ‘dominant’ call.
  • - Retain ‘surrender’ call.
Upright tackles
  • - Referees to examine stricter application of the ‘held’ call where multiple defenders ‘hold-up’ a ball carrier to gain time.
  • - Late tacklers in such situations banned from attacking the legs of the ball carrier.
Protecting the kicker
  • - Players seeking to charge down a kick must not leap into the air when approaching kicker.
Obstruction rule
  • - Retain current interpretation
Interchange rule
  • - The retention of the current numbers was discussed but with a restriction on the number of times an individual player could return to the field.
Captain’s Challenge
  • - Discussion on whether captains could make one or two challenges per half for video review.
  • - Suggestions included that this be limited to stripping penalties only.
Scrums
  • - The defending team should be moved 10m behind the scrum (current rule is 5m) to increase attacking options.
Sin-Bin
  • - A look at whether the length of a ‘sin-bin’ should be reduced and whether the period should end automatically the offending team has conceded a try.
In-Goal areas
  • - Suggestion that in-goal areas be standardised at 6m to encourage more attack ‘through the hands’ rather than through kicks.
Time wasting
  • - Standardise ‘time-out’ periods after a try is scored and after the referee has awarded a line drop-out.
The advisory group consisted of: David Gallop, Geoff Carr, Graham Annesley, Matt Rodwell, Warren Ryan, Michael Buettner, Bill Harrigan, Tony Archer, Stuart Raper, Ron Massey, Gorden Tallis, Sean Fagan, Wayne Pearce, Laurie Daley, Warren Smith, Andrew Voss, Dr Hugh Hazard, Jason Stevens.
Source: NRL

http://nrl.com/News/Latest/NewsArticle/tabid/76/NewsId/7397/Default.aspx

Any ideas on why they invited 'ole Stuey?
 

Quigs

Immortal
Messages
35,194
I just hope they didn't get George to plan the agenda for the think tank.

(psssts and I am sick to farkin' death of rule changes - will we see the 5, 287th rule change since 2003)

Cheers
Declared Idiot #88
Quigs
 

Frenzy.

Post Whore
Messages
53,905
Think tank?

FMFFJJ there are some frightenly ridiculous topics for discussion there.

example 1

Captain’s Challenge

- Discussion on whether captains could make one or two challenges per half for video review.

Why only 2? Won't take this long to fail when some poor skipper needs to make 2 challenges in the first 15 minutes (or whatever) then can't challenge anything further. STUPID IDEA. This one would of been Raper's I suppose.

- Suggestions included that this be limited to stripping penalties only.

FUGG. WHy put that on the captains. Just fuggen get rid of the stupid rule.

Here's an idea for them. Just eliminate the next 20 years of evolution and adopt the rules of Gridiron now because this is where they are headed.
 

Quigs

Immortal
Messages
35,194
Why don't they just ring up Channel Nine and ask them what rule changes they want to improve the ratings.

I reckon no half time breaks just 8 x 5 minute ad breaks during a game. Plus with stoppages for 'going upstairs' we could have approx 220 ads per game.

Now think of that for sponsors revenue.

Cheers
Declared Idiot #88
Quigs
 

Ausguy

Coach
Messages
14,887
not one current nrl coach there.....why talk about rules if the coaches have no say in it....yet they get old players like jason steven, tallis, daley......
 

Latest posts

Top