Rumoured & Confirmed Signings - Part 5

[Chins get the wins]

In a proper debate process, American politics excluded, you should be objective in proposing arguments which do not align with your own.

Chins does not subscribe or offer any objectivity of any topic which does not align with his own viewpoints or ideology that is just the way he is.

I'm one of the only posters on here who'll admit when I get it wrong

 

[Chins get the wins]

He did his time, served his suspension and as everyone is entitled, was given a second chance, a chance at redemption. I don’t see anything wrong with that.

Yeah nah that bloke was juicing as a teen. His whole body was built on cheating

 

[Luke Bowden]

Not violent, the woman in this story isn't one of the victims.

There wasn't even a crime committed. More a moral issue. No way on earth can he stay at the Roosters though.

Someone will pick him up for sure, I dont expect any of his new non single team mates to invite him over for BBQs.

What happened?

 

[Chins get the wins]

What happened?

Conor Watson might like a word with him........

 

[Fangs]

We are talking about a rumour here aren't we?

It's obvious that something has happened for a release to be offered but I would want a bit more substance before laying the boot in.

 

[Luke Bowden]

Conor Watson might like a word with him........

Hahahaha…. What would Connor Watson say??? Tryell would crush his skull…

 

[Chins get the wins]

Hahahaha…. What would Connor Watson say??? Tryell would crush his skull…

Well yeah that is the way the May boys operate

 

[Kilkenny]

I'm one of the only posters on here who'll admit when I get it wrong

You have on many more than one occasion suggested Tyrone May was responsible for violence against a female. The offences he was involved in did not involve personal violence however distasteful his offences may have been.

 

[Chins get the wins]

You have on many more than one occasion suggested Tyrone May was responsible for violence against a female. The offences he was involved in did not involve personal violence however distasteful his offences may have been.

What he did was has bad. He's a weak low human

 

[Kilkenny]

What he did was has bad. He's a weak low human

Yes it was wrong, I have never suggested otherwise but it wasn’t an act of violence against a female. It was an offence against a female, no question, but there was no violence involved and you shouldn’t suggest otherwise. As I have suggested on more than one occasion, the question that remains is who posted the video or videos in the public domain. That question has never fully been resolved, it wasn’t CHN, so given the rumours around whom it was it remains the big unknown? It is a shame that question has never been resolved, if it was you may not have liked the answer.

 

[Kilkenny]

What happened?

1 and 1 generally equates to two.

 

[Kilkenny]

What he did was has bad. He's a weak low human

His morals aren’t the issue, you avoid the obvious, his offences of which he was convicted did not involve violence. So perhaps you should acknowledge that fact given your many posts about stating the truth?