What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,908
I think the main difference between the two is Dufty is a tougher player and is prepared to put his body on the line, engage the line at speed and get belted if need be. French seems hesitant to me. I also think French’s playmaking is a bit overrated.

I think if you swapped our pack for theirs you would see a different attitude and ability level from all our current backs.
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,908
Obviously we do not know all the details, putting a squad to together is pretty complex.

What wouId you say if this is the scenario, Norman is going, BA is negotiating with a very good forward like Taupau but he realises he needs another half with NRL experience but can’t afford another in the Norman price if we sign Taupau. Plus we need to increase our offer slightly for Taupau.

Lamb is then offered to the eels for a very decent price. BA thinks lamb is an ok option for 2 years (but not the perfect option but Taupau will offset any negatives ) as he thinks he can get some good improvement in him. It also gives him time to ease Brown / salmon into the NRL.

So we sign Lamb and now have the cash for Taupau.

It also frees up some cash having a cheaper half option to spend on a hooker.

There are so many variables to consider.

Yeah or maybe the coach of whoever f**king does the dumb arse recruiting for us would have gone after Arron Woods when he was available and not let the Sharks get him at the bargain basement price of $450k. If we had offered around $500-550k we probably would now have a front row pairing of two of the best forward meter gainers and offloaders still in their prime years.

Instead we will if we get Taupau, need to spend around $700k, he is reported as being on back ended contract of around $900k, for a error prone, penalty prone, 30+ year old. Great strategy if true.
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
62,911
I think even if we do not sign anyone and keep same squad we can go into 2019 optimistic of top 5 finish.
Few additions will be good. After last night performance to me its clear the coach or atleast coaching staff need.a freshen up.
A.John and Gould both talked about how we attack and how predictable it is.
Unsure why so kany on here dont want to listen
 

Joshuatheeel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,182
Yeah or maybe the coach of whoever f**king does the dumb arse recruiting for us would have gone after Arron Woods when he was available and not let the Sharks get him at the bargain basement price of $450k. If we had offered around $500-550k we probably would now have a front row pairing of two of the best forward meter gainers and offloaders still in their prime years.

Instead we will if we get Taupau, need to spend around $700k, he is reported as being on back ended contract of around $900k, for a error prone, penalty prone, 30+ year old. Great strategy if true.

You twist every f**ken story to make the eels to look shit and every other club to look great!!

How do you know he went to the sharks for $450k - show some evidence this is the case? the reports state the Dogs were unwilling to release him unless the sharks met their price and the deal was dead until the last minute - so did the sharks up their offer?

Second how do you know we didn’t offer Woods $550k, is this just an assumption on your behalf. It you know we didn’t, any chance you could give us further information on our recruitment? Come on give some info!!

How the f**k do you know we need to offer Taupau $700k or if we are?

I suspect, actually I f**ken know this, if the Sharks had signed Taupau and we signed Woods, you wouId be claiming we paid overs for wood and he is a shit player while sharks are geniuses and got one of the best middle forwards at a bargin price!!
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,270
You twist every f**ken story to make the eels to look shit and every other club to look great!!

How do you know he went to the sharks for $450k - show some evidence this is the case? the reports state the Dogs were unwilling to release him unless the sharks met their price and the deal was dead until the last minute - so did the sharks up their offer?

Second how do you know we didn’t offer Woods $550k, is this just an assumption on your behalf. It you know we didn’t, any chance you could give us further information on our recruitment? Come on give some info!!

How the f**k do you know we need to offer Taupau $700k or if we are?

I suspect, actually I f**ken know this, if the Sharks had signed Taupau and we signed Woods, you wouId be claiming we paid overs for wood and he is a shit player while sharks are geniuses and got one of the best middle forwards at a bargin price!!

I can't see the post you've quoted, which means I know exactly which lunatic posted it...

Lol Woods is a slug, we already have three players doing the same kind of job Woods does. Woods on 450k is overs on form.

He's nice and white, but, so he's everything we need!

I don't think we'll get Taupau but he's second only to Taumololololol in terms of middle forwards and he makes Woods look like Justin Tsoulos
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,908
You twist every f**ken story to make the eels to look shit and every other club to look great!!

How do you know he went to the sharks for $450k - show some evidence this is the case? the reports state the Dogs were unwilling to release him unless the sharks met their price and the deal was dead until the last minute - so did the sharks up their offer?

Second how do you know we didn’t offer Woods $550k, is this just an assumption on your behalf. It you know we didn’t, any chance you could give us further information on our recruitment? Come on give some info!!

How the f**k do you know we need to offer Taupau $700k or if we are?

I suspect, actually I f**ken know this, if the Sharks had signed Taupau and we signed Woods, you wouId be claiming we paid overs for wood and he is a shit player while sharks are geniuses and got one of the best middle forwards at a bargin price!!


Well, for starters, I paint the picture that most other clubs are better then us because we are stone motherless last a-f**kin-gen!!!

As for payment amounts? The reason I posted those very figures for Woods is because it was widely reported at least in the television media that that is exactly what the offer to Woods from the Sharks was and that is why it was reported that the negotiations from the Dogs side had stalled, because it made no economical sense to the Dogs to let Woods go at that price.

They needed genuine Salary relief, not just to be hijacked by the Sharks and their lowball offfer. Then at the last hour, Woods took it upon himself to forgo $200k off his conTract with the Dogs to get them to agree for the trade to happen. So therefore the Sharks have gotten a marquee player at a steal of a deal price.

But I reckon, my opinion only is that if we came in much earlier when the negotiating was at its start or peak and offered anywhere around that $550k mark we would have gotten him.

As for Taupau, they are the figures that are being bandied around at this stage, but I'm sure we will get a much clearer picture if anything were to actually transpire.
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,375
So the Roosters have signed Ryan Hall and Brett Morris to replace Ferguson.

What are they going to do with Tupou? Surely he's not part of their plans now
 

Happy MEel

First Grade
Messages
9,859
You think we are going to jump from 16th to 5th or better ? May I ask how? We are poorly coached with too many players going backwards. Even adding Paulo and Lane doesn’t improve us that much
Fergo will help...not sure about 5th though.
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,270
Fergo will help...not sure about 5th though.

We have severely under-performed this year, though, so 16th isn't a reflection of our ability as much as a reflection of our performance.

I had us 6th this year, I see no reason why we can't finish thereabouts next year IF we perform to our ability, which we haven't even been close to this year.

I'd say our side next year is at least slightly better than the side we had last year, although I'm still concerned about the 9 jersey.
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,908
I can't see the post you've quoted, which means I know exactly which lunatic posted it...

Lol Woods is a slug, we already have three players doing the same kind of job Woods does. Woods on 450k is overs on form.

He's nice and white, but, so he's everything we need!

I don't think we'll get Taupau but he's second only to Taumololololol in terms of middle forwards and he makes Woods look like Justin Tsoulos


I wanted Taupau 3 or 4 years ago, no actually I wanted him when he was in the lower grade at Canturbery. Now he is a major risk. Big price tag that can easily go wrong.
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,908
I can't see the post you've quoted, which means I know exactly which lunatic posted it...

Lol Woods is a slug, we already have three players doing the same kind of job Woods does. Woods on 450k is overs on form.

He's nice and white, but, so he's everything we need!

I don't think we'll get Taupau but he's second only to Taumololololol in terms of middle forwards and he makes Woods look like Justin Tsoulos

Oh and get it right mate, I'm a racist, not a colourist. Dumbf**k.
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,761
What about Craig Garvey anyone? Been pretty good for Mounties from what little I've seen. I take not getting game time in Canberra with a grain of salt because Stuart
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,270
What about Craig Garvey anyone? Been pretty good for Mounties from what little I've seen. I take not getting game time in Canberra with a grain of salt because Stuart

He's another Cameron King IMO. Good enough bit part player but maybe not what you want in NRL week to week without a quality hooker alongside him
 

Latest posts

Top