hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 153,677
My new skin cream really seems to be working, you should of seen the before shots.I'm still trying to work out which head is uglier.
or
My new skin cream really seems to be working, you should of seen the before shots.I'm still trying to work out which head is uglier.
or
Just wait for me to post the same thing and you can like that.Can I like this twice??
So BA hasn’t even spoken to him?“We’re about to talk to him to see what he wants to do.’’
Dont f**ken startSo BA hasn’t even spoken to him?
You said you couldn't imagine being called something worse.
So a F is a pass for us tho, especially for Pou.7 from 15 is hardly anything to get excited about, but it suppose it is for us Parra fans.
It’s probably option C.I think the nut hugging gotten to you. Either that or you’re getting old
Again?Go f**k a panda
f**k. What’s hineys two heads look like?
Our biggest problem year after year is our high injury count. My question is why? Will bigger forwards reduce our toll? Why do we continually have this problem when clubs like Storm, Roosters and Broncos seem to always have a low injury count? If we fix that up we'll always finish higher up the ladder.The thing is this...
After 16 and 17 BA was one of the most in demand coaches in the league, performance was good especially during the salary cap saga,17 was almost great and then 18 happens, I’m sure it’s a mixture of poor coaching, poor player performance and a bad administration setup..so the fact that the board is giving him the benefit of the doubt in 19 is fair IMO. Would I have been happy if he was punted after this year, absolutely! But I think he deserves a 2nd chance so let’s give him that
No but a C is definitely a pass. I understand you want to make the finals every year and win premierships but you have to understand the deck is stacked against us without TPAs. A lot of TPAs.So a F is a pass for us tho, especially for Pou.
I’d say it’s as simple as the fact that injury-prone players are cheaper due to higher risk of unavailability.Our biggest problem year after year is our high injury count. My question is why? Will bigger forwards reduce our toll? Why do we continually have this problem when clubs like Storm, Roosters and Broncos seem to always have a low injury count? If we fix that up we'll always finish higher up the ladder.
“Pangai Jnr was also involved in negotiations with the Sydney Roosters and Canberra while Parramatta held discussions with Lodge.”
https://www.theherald.com.au/story/...-in-failed-bid-to-sign-star-broncos-forwards/
Thanks Barry, you useless merkin.
I bet Brisbane haven’t recorded themselves talking about how they are going to structure a heap of TPAs to keep them on the books.What is most telling about that article is the familiar headline. Stars decide to remain at Broncos for less. Meanwhile they have Bird on $1M multi-year deal and they haven't even used him yet.
Broncos stars Tevita Pangai Jnr and Matt Lodge reject multi-million offers from the Knights to remain in Brisbane
I bet Brisbane haven’t recorded themselves talking about how they are going to structure a heap of TPAs to keep them on the books.
That’s smart.
What are you talking about? 2003-05 went Panthers, Dogs, Tigers. Case closed. Good job ToodsterFrom time-to-time a team will rise from the bunch and allow Todd to remark how well the salary cap is working.