Eelementary
Post Whore
- Messages
- 57,275
I don't think he was, either - but that doesn't really denigrate what he was, which was a very reliable above average First Grade NRL prop.I have no problem with Timmy, but his stats reflected a lot of 'pre-contact' metres, particularly from kick offs. He was a good defender, and was ok at eating metres in between the 20 metre lines but he rarely bent the line (at least in last few seasons). He was also quite good at hitting the ground face down. But he wasn't in the top 50% of starting props in the NRL in my opinion anyway.