Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
It's certainly not because we can't afford Radradra. It's because we don't want to pay overs. I doubt Jennings is on that much either. He came because we offered security (a four year contract at age 27), not because we offered stupid money. Our offer to Hayne shows we'd rather lose a player than pay overs.
That article is referring to the revised deal ... not the original f**k up
Bye bye Semi sadly.
the never registered his contract
Yeah I reckon. Maybe more. Jennings is worth about that too, IMO.
Maybe no NRL team
Agreed. Moeroa is off contract. How much is he worth to us? And if another club offers that much plus $200k surely we should let him go.
And around and around and around we go where Pou stops nobody goes.
Yes but I doubt we'll be cheating. If we can't pay Radradra outside the cap (as an inducement to stay, which is cheating) then we shouldn't match bigger offers.
WTF are you on about? We should only keep Radradra if we're cheating. How hard is that to understand? If we can't cheat we shouldn't match bigger offers. It will f**k our salary cap.
No we should magically find rich fans masquerading as sponsors willing to pay a player $300k to turn up at a couple of games of golf. And then tell the NRL it's not an inducement to re-sign with us.
