Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 91,178
Without the clause he might not have come. These clauses don’t end up in contracts for shits and gigs. They are part of the negotiation process. Without them there would have to be something else given up.
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Without the clause he might not have come. These clauses don’t end up in contracts for shits and gigs. They are part of the negotiation process. Without them there would have to be something else given up.
Has any club in history ever signed a bad player? If the answer is yes then what you just said doesn’t really matter.
His 5 mins before hes exiled back to NSW Cup will be amazing.Our recruitment is fine.
We've got some bloke from Newcastle's NSW cup side who is going to be a great depth signing. MON well done sir
He attracted Corey Norman, Darcy Lussick, and Nathan Peats whilst he was here.
Living in Canberra is probably Stuart’s biggest recruitment issue…,
That probably doesn't help, and is easier for players to move around Sydney teams, but would players from the country rather move to Canberra or Sydney? I suspect Canberra is an easier option, so there development should be better.
Depends what you mean by ‘bad’. In a top 30 every club will have players they hope never get on the field. From there it’s a spectrum to the best players in rugby league.
How do you know he’ll ever play first grade? There will be a few forwards in front of him.
He got Tapine from Newcastle.
There is that! 5mins may be a stretch for sure.
He wasn't really an established NRL player at the time though.
Alternatively, a bad signing is when you could have signed someone better for comparable value. Do you know if the Dolphins couldn’t have signed someone better?
Clearly they could have, since nobody has any proof of what they paid. But because they are new, they have to pay overs. Therefore all their signings are bad signings.
These are the merkins that are most likely to provide high value. I remember he was seen as a player with high potential.
No, and neither do you. Therefore neither of us can say it was a bad signing, but only one of us is attempting to.
That might be the case, but were we even remotely interested in signing him? Was anyone else??
Tapine? I believe Newcastle wanted to keep him.
If what you say is true then nobody is in a position to say if a player is good or bad. I’m sure you don’t really think that.
