Dylan wasn't really good last year, 2021.I dont think dylan to centre said much about dylan ... other than they respected his ability to play well in another position
I think it just said they thought that was the strongest team we could field at the time with a bunch of outside backs injured .... and thats certainly up for debate
I retract my postMost sensible post of 2022.
I dont think we moved Dylan to centre until we were missing plenty ... sivo, dunster, russell, waqa, opa(?), edit: and niukore ... it looks like rnd 7 vs knights was the first game where our backs were Perham, Will, Drown, Simonssen ..... did we also give it a run in a trial?Dylan wasn't really good last year, 2021.
If he had the same year this year, we wouldve just offered him something and said that's it take it or leave it.
I don't know his back ground but has he played in other positions before?
Some how, they thought that putting a rookie in the spine and shifting the incumbent to centre could work, i am assuming, that he hasn't played much centre before.
I think they thought dyl may just not be the half we want. He shifted his attention in and out of games. But he's athletic, maybe he could do centre
Ja, i felt was always in the thought of ba.
He trains well, he seems mature and does not have brain farts that much at his age. He works hard and is a student of the game. All very good attributes.
I just don't like how slow he is. If ja could some how pick up some acceleration, then i would change my mind
When they did try the ja, dyl switch who was out? Sivo and dunster? We had will, waqa, oppa and russell. Don't recall when we got simonssen but to put in ja, who was also a rookie at the beginning of the year, and switch dyl instead of putting another backup on the wing yells to me ja was in the mix and dyls position was in jeopardy
However, it couldve been that move of shifting him to centre that really kicked him in the bum and he realised that he needed to get his act together
Dylan got moved there during round 1. TCT had been hinting it might happen during the 21/22 off season.I dont think we moved Dylan to centre until we were missing plenty ... sivo, dunster, russell, waqa, opa(?) ... it looks like rnd 7 vs knights was the first game where our backs were Perham, Will, Drown, Simonssen ..... did we also give it a run in a trial?
I dont know if there would have been a kick in Dyls bum involved unless it was done as a potential permenant move - but i think all knew it was temporary.
But it may well have played an unintended roll in helping him break out .... i reckon drown broke out cos he ran more. Maybe playing centre helped him think, run first ... and it dawned on him he can burn alot of oppositions with his pace
And yeah i am sure JA was in BAs mind ... but i think it was injuries that led to dyl at centre
As a replacement during the game when russell went off injured .... thats covering an injury during a gameDylan got moved there during round 1. TCT had been hinting it might happen during the 21/22 off season.
Yea but that was the first time we “moved Dylan to centre”. Not round 7.As a replacement during the game when russell went off injured .... thats covering an injury during a game
That worked well we were up 26-12 the attack was flowing beautifully and within 10 mins were down 28-26 and had to claw our way back with 3 penalty goals to win the game while our attack went to dogshit for the last 50 mins.As a replacement during the game when russell went off injured .... thats covering an injury during a game
I think it was tried in the trial.As a replacement during the game when russell went off injured .... thats covering an injury during a game
Because you keep denying you’re wrong. First choice doesn’t mean the players picked in any given week. Nobody has ‘admitted’ that it does.For choice for round 1, perhaps is what you're looking for there - if you're wanting to indicate first choice/ranked for a season?
You can't choose someone first in a round, if they're unavailable to be chosen... but it's amusing how much energy you guys are still putting into something that was a simple error within a post on emjaycee's part, which he has admitted. This would have been over in two posts - my factcheck, and an (eventual) emjaycee acknowledgement - if you gents hadn't been as apparently ruffled by it .
Im not saying it was a good thingThat worked well we were up 26-12 the attack was flowing beautifully and within 10 mins were down 28-26 and had to claw our way back with 3 penalty goals to win the game while our attack went to dogshit for the last 50 mins.
They trained that way all off season. But injuriesDylan got moved there during round 1. TCT had been hinting it might happen during the 21/22 off season.
Sigh. No one is discussing the semantics of "first choice" except you #poutangent.Because you keep denying you’re wrong. First choice doesn’t mean the players picked in any given week. Nobody has ‘admitted’ that it does.
We also belted the Knights with Drown at centre for 80 minutes. Which game is more meaningful? The one where we put the queue in the rack or the other one?That worked well we were up 26-12 the attack was flowing beautifully and within 10 mins were down 28-26 and had to claw our way back with 3 penalty goals to win the game while our attack went to dogshit for the last 50 mins.
pick your best 13 and worry about the numbers on their back later
I think it was tried in the trial.
So it was always something that they had been thinking of
The question was originally, if stone did not get injured, ja would not have had so many chances but i begged to differAnd it only ever occurred when we had fewer than four outside backs available.