Rumours and Stuff

[Twizzle]

 

[emjaycee]

*dick

what's a wardick?

 

[lingard]

He does it because I’m living rent free in his head, apparently.

What's it like in there?

 

[hindy111]

what's a wardick?

I'll google it and post a photo. Hang on a second.

 

[hindy111]

what's a wardick?

Ok something like this.

 

[84 Baby]

what's a wardick?

From Mad Max

 

[yy_cheng]

Ok something like this.

View attachment 71910

You gonna get suspended again

 

[Happy MEel]

Ok something like this.

View attachment 71910

Looks like Ricky Stuart

 

[Homo man69]

Croft wants to come home? But just resigned till 2030....

Really? Last I heard he was keen to come home

 

[gaffer]

did sivo miss the chase the collision meeting

 

[Happy MEel]

Wrong thread

 

[Happy MEel]

did sivo miss the chase the collision meeting

Yeah and his “front loading effort” is his first run. Then he doesn’t give a shit.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Pou is a Sour patch kid.

*bald

 

[Poupou Escobar]

What's it like in there?

I think the previous tenant shat on the carpet.

 

[the phantom menace]

this is what I meant the other day when I said something about you always wanting to prove Pou wrong... there was no need for your comment to Pou's post so I am genuinely interested in why you do it.

Um, because it was the most recent post in the thread I was reading, and I happened to disagree and replied to it? Like I would to anyone's post I disagree with if in any thread I'm reading...

Pou posts quite regulalry across any thread here, so it's quite hard to avoid his posts - if that's what you're suggesting I do...? (Which seems quite weird - just like why you'd care so much about whose posts I reply to and whose I don't...)

I'm not wanting to "prove" anyone wrong - just so happens I think a lot of "opinions" he posts happen to be shit, so you're probably just noticing that prevalence.

I can't believe that Parramatta lost the 2022 NRL grand final to Penrith - opinion or fact?

Well it's your opinion, because you're stating it like one ("I can't believe") - conveying the primary subject of the sentence is you and your belief (opinion). Are you seriously trying to argue that is the same as just stating the fact "Parramatta lost..."?

 

[the phantom menace]

Here’s you being dishonest again.

“Can’t believe” is a rhetorical device conveying disagreement with the thing the speaker can’t believe. If he didn’t believe it he would say that.

Conveying disagreement is still an opinion though, right - and not a fact?

I can’t believe you didn’t already know this.

Thanks for conveying your opinion... nothing factual there in teh rest to be bothered with .

 

[Poupou Escobar]

just like why you'd care so much about whose posts I reply to and whose I don't...

Because you accuse others of stuff you do yourself, they call you out on it.

 

[the phantom menace]

He does it because I’m living rent free in his head, apparently.

Or you just happen to post shit through all the threads on the forum that it's unavoidable, and so the chances of me replying to you are higher than to someone who posts once a week?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Are you seriously trying to argue that is the same as just stating the fact "Parramatta lost..."?

In both cases, the clause about Parramatta losing is stated as fact.

 

[the phantom menace]

Because you accuse others of stuff you do yourself, they call you out on it.