You're the one stating that we probably aren't. We are saying that there has been no mention that he is being subsidized by the Tigers and his salary at the Tigers for the next two seasons has been reported at $600K a season. So unless there is some evidence or reporting that the Eels are getting the Tigers to pay 'X' then why all the mental gymnastics from you the apologists?
He is owed what he is owed. We want him, the Tigers may have said you can have him on our terms. How do you know that that isn't the case? Sure they may have been happy to let him go, but at full freight, how do you know any different? But what we know due to the reporting is what he is owed, so unless it is stated somewhere or you have privileged information we owe him $600K.
Now you prove otherwise.
You are making allegations that we signed him for less then what the reported $600K he is on for the next two seasons. So prove it.
Oh you can't. No link to that?
So find a link to your statements or shut up and stop spreading fake news.
We have links to our assertions that he is on $600K for the next 2 seasons though in previous posts. Go look it up.
You're welcome.
Yeah nah.
There's no "proof" that his re-signing was 600k, unless right now you wanna say what's been said on NRL 360 is gospel?
Do you?
Then there is no evidence to suggest we signed him for whatever the f**k the Tigers signed him for.
Like I said earlier there is always the potential for more moving parts to the deal, and it's likely in this one there is simply because Joffa being extended, then a few months later isn't wanted suggests very strongly there is
Your Proof is shit
Your assertion that others need to disprove your shit proof is shit.
And you can write a 1000 word post attempting to to show otherwise, but unfortunately it too will be shit.