So what's the record now?Just a note Leeds lost again last night! Good!
How long before the Leeds equivalent start the poll whether they want to keep the coach...fraud.. oh I might upset someone by saying that
So what's the record now?Just a note Leeds lost again last night! Good!
So what's the record now?
How long before the Leeds equivalent start the poll whether they want to keep the coach...fraud.. oh I might upset someone by saying that
So what's the record now?
How long before the Leeds equivalent start the poll whether they want to keep the coach...fraud.. oh I might upset someone by saying that
But not with the same advantages. You can't honestly pretend it's a level playing field when the same clubs are near the top every year.But we participate in the same player market
It means either the club or player can decide to continue the contract, for whatever value is agreed in the option.How does a MUTUAL OPTION work in a players contract.
I beleive LANE and SIVO have them for 2026. Does it mean we can say no and contract is finished?
ffsI just finished a meeting with the small council and they explained how it works.
Sivo for example has a MO for 2026.
If he takes it the value maybe 350k
If Parra take it the value could be 550k
Either party can exercise the option.
A massive 12 tackles and 42 metres today. It's up there with Dan Keir's contribution on Friday.Trey Mooney
Another one we let get away
We should've given him whatever he was asking for ffsAnd he was captain of SG Ball or Flegg when that happened..
We sign some of them, e.g. Lomax. It's not a secret who the good players are ffs. The problem is some clubs get them cheaper (under the cap) than everyone else, which means they can fit more quality players under the cap. It's the accounting that separates the top clubs from the rest, not talent identification. The 'right people' have ways of getting players to agree to cheaper deals (under the cap anyway).Yes we do. If we had the right people in the retain and retention side of things we could sign quality players that other sides end up signing. So yeah if you're worth your paycheque as HOF then you can influence the quality of players other clubs put together.
But not with the same advantages. You can't honestly pretend it's a level playing field when the same clubs are near the top every year.
We sign some of them, e.g. Lomax. It's not a secret who the good players are ffs. The problem is some clubs get them cheaper (under the cap) than everyone else, which means they can fit more quality players under the cap. It's the accounting that separates the top clubs from the rest, not talent identification. The 'right people' have ways of getting players to agree to cheaper deals (under the cap anyway).
Stop being melodramaticWe should've given him whatever he was asking for ffs
Is he any good? Almost 24 and only played 22 NRL games. Ten tries scored. Russell just turned 22 and has 37 games with 17 tries.And Wilson was happy to resign as a backup.. apparently no one does that.
33% at Leeds matches his semi final winning record in 11 years here1-2 currently
Been a baaaaaaaaaaaaaad year for Pou, a Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad baaaaaaaaaaaaaad year.Dear Brad please come back.
Pou misses you
His slipping further away 55% and closer to 50%.So what's the record now?
How long before the Leeds equivalent start the poll whether they want to keep the coach...fraud.. oh I might upset someone by saying that
You watch his presser.Leeds were up 16-6. Had a penalty in front of the posts and went for the try instead.
Ended up losing the game 22-16
Go Bradley
I'm guilty your honour.. i watched it.You watch his presser.
Effort was there but played dumb.
I swear I heard the same shit 120 times at Parramatta.