King-Gutho94
Coach
- Messages
- 15,715
Our talent ID has been poor for 20 years at Junior level.Nepotism in my view is only a small problem. Did the Arthurs get preferential treatment? Probably. They got access at very young age to high level training and first grade standards that others simply would never be able to get. This in itself isn’t necessarily a bad thing, maybe it could’ve been opened up to more juniors but then who do you choose and that again is preferential treatment (even if it’s not the kids father selecting them).
This lent itself to pushing both of them for junior rep selections, but people who want to deny they weren’t very good juniors are off chops or wilfully ignorant.
The way bigger issue, and one that predates Arthurs, probably all the way back to pre-Hagan is our inability to take the hundreds of good juniors we’ve had in that time and turn them into NRL players. I know it’s a TheRamism but clearly there’s something that can be dramatically improved there.
Are we victim of demographics you could possibly say so.
The more quantity of bigger Polynesian kids that have moved into the area has meant it's harder to judge talent coming through because at young ages they just steamroll over little Johnny. So that kills you on two fronts.
One the big Polynesian kid may dominate in under 6s up to under 14s purely due to size but once everyone gets a bit stronger and you make seniors they haven't really developed anything else in there game and they get found out in teenage rep sides once everyone has caught up strength wise.
And you have the other side of the coin where a lot kids haven't fully developed to handle these players younger and either get ignored or lost in the system and picked up elsewhere when they have fully developed.
The knock of Ryan Papenhuyzen was he was too small hence we didn't want him as a kid.
The Broncos did the same thing with Thurston.