What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Soren Lorenson

First Grade
Messages
7,548
Advanced body metrics like arm length and hand size are a big part of the scouting process in the NFL but I haven't heard anyone employed in the NRL ever bring it up in their conversations with me.

With that said there are absolutely athletic profiles that teams are scouting for on a positional basis. Melbourne really pioneered the way on the craze for tall, athletic props in recent times. While other teams have fielded singular props in that vein, the Storm not only have a first-grade pack full of them but their lower grades and even cast-offs (Dean Britt etc) are loaded up with that type. It really is their pack identity.

My gut feel is that I think we are probably a little less single-minded in our internal scouting profiles for props. We absolutely have a number of young kids that will draw comparisons to props from Melbourne and probably more so in recent times but if you really want to distill the scouting process down...you always want the biggest, fastest, strongest, smartest etc player in every position. At some point though you have to compromise because you don't have unlimited resources internally and the talent pool isn't infinite. Even then, there are guys like Nathan Brown who sort of break the rules and kick arse despite their considerably smaller stature.

Back to your original question though, I would not be shocked if Melbourne prioritised wing span (and maybe hand size). It gives greater leverage and reach when fending and offloading while bigger hands probably translate to marginally superior ball security. In defence it gives each defender a larger 'soft zone' of coverage to use their arms to otherwise make up ground for a tackle on top of greater ability to wrap up the ball. Perhaps they might even apply it for wingers given that they can do so much with so little space these days and every extra centimetre of wingspan is potentially an extra try or three scored in the corner or bomb defused over the course of a season.
Thankyou.
 

Forty20

First Grade
Messages
7,677
Wing span is a big advantage. Much like wings.

Spoken like a typical fooken Melbourne Storm apologist, Gary. The only reason a man would really endorse the supposed benefits of wings in football would be if he knew that the Storm would dominate said players in the ruck with their superior application of the chicken wing tackle.
 

Happy MEel

First Grade
Messages
9,845
Spoken like a typical fooken Melbourne Storm apologist, Gary. The only reason a man would really endorse the supposed benefits of wings in football would be if he knew that the Storm would dominate said players in the ruck with their superior application of the chicken wing tackle.
I bet Gary’s real name is Cam.
 
Messages
19,378
Spoken like a typical fooken Melbourne Storm apologist, Gary. The only reason a man would really endorse the supposed benefits of wings in football would be if he knew that the Storm would dominate said players in the ruck with their superior application of the chicken wing tackle.

Phil Mann had quite a wing span, but he didn't do us any good.
 

Forty20

First Grade
Messages
7,677
I bet Gary’s real name is Cam.

giphy.gif


*Edit* Fricking Dickbutt in my GIF, edited to change it lest it fairly incurs the wrath of the mods.
 
Last edited:

Snoochies

First Grade
Messages
5,633
Fittler has chosen his 38 man emerging squad. Moses, Tepai, Schneider, French. Think Gutho is abit hard done by, unless he's a QLDer??
 

Latest posts

Top