The knights need someone who can lead them around the park
he's not their man, he's just not a no 7 for mine
Funny you should mention that… this article mentions it a couple of times too.There’s a few people responsible for this fiasco, strangely not the Orrs , understand this will probably mean 50 responses from Pou, but it’s certainly not desirable to allow so much power to the player and his manager
I reckon they should go for someone like Jamal Fogarty. He couldn't cost the world but is a huge upside from what they have. He is fighting to retain his spot and get re-signed by Raiders but I reckon he can play and would be a bargain quality buy for them.he's not their man, he's just not a no 7 for mine
he's not their man, he's just not a no 7 for mine
He's insurance in case (when) Ponga buggers off.
Wait so the Knights are only offering a million a season matching what his contract goes up to if he takes his player option with us?
Gavin Orr is at it again.Funny you should mention that… this article mentions it a couple of times too.
$6 MILLION MAN: Rival NRL club weighs-up first monster bid for star Eels playmaker
$6 MILLION MAN: Rival NRL club weighs-up first monster bid for star Eels playmakerwww.foxsports.com.au
The nights have the benefit of a link to Dyl's best mate BA. I wouldnt be surprised to see BA at the Knights when he's done at Leeds. Jake will probably end up there tooWait so the Knights are only offering a million a season matching what his contract goes up to if he takes his player option with us?
I heard someone talking about an "alliance" - anyone able to fill me in? What is it? Good/ bad/ ugly?
He woud be, but there's a big chance that they're going to need cover me thinks.expensive policy with a huge excess
There’s a few people responsible for this fiasco
it’s certainly not desirable to allow so much power to the player and his manager
Only if you believe the mediaWait so the Knights are only offering a million a season matching what his contract goes up to if he takes his player option with us?
He is off contract ffs. Should we match whatever rival clubs are offering him? Some of them are more desperate than we are.There’s a few people responsible for this fiasco, strangely not the Orrs , understand this will probably mean 50 responses from Pou, but it’s certainly not desirable to allow so much power to the player and his manager
"The Eels have only got themselves to blame for Brown currently being a free agent with the club agreeing to insert two get out clauses in his eight-year contract until the end of 2031."Funny you should mention that… this article mentions it a couple of times too.
$6 MILLION MAN: Rival NRL club weighs-up first monster bid for star Eels playmaker
$6 MILLION MAN: Rival NRL club weighs-up first monster bid for star Eels playmakerwww.foxsports.com.au
And at the price you can afford. You could sign any player long term with zero player options if you paid him enough. But when 'enough' means overs then maybe it's not a good idea.What fiasco? A player coming off contract?
No of course it's not desirable. No club wants to give players options in the player's favour.
But sometimes you just have to do something you don't want in order to sign the player you do want.
So we agreed to PO's as a way of keeping him....only for him to be able to leave anyway courtesy of same PO's.... GeniusBut sometimes you just have to do something you don't want in order to sign the player you do want