What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Delboy

First Grade
Messages
7,651
There’s a few people responsible for this fiasco, strangely not the Orrs , understand this will probably mean 50 responses from Pou, but it’s certainly not desirable to allow so much power to the player and his manager
 

Matty Bhoy

Juniors
Messages
2,047
There’s a few people responsible for this fiasco, strangely not the Orrs , understand this will probably mean 50 responses from Pou, but it’s certainly not desirable to allow so much power to the player and his manager
Funny you should mention that… this article mentions it a couple of times too.

 

eels_fan

First Grade
Messages
7,618
Wait so the Knights are only offering a million a season matching what his contract goes up to if he takes his player option with us?
The nights have the benefit of a link to Dyl's best mate BA. I wouldnt be surprised to see BA at the Knights when he's done at Leeds. Jake will probably end up there too
 

King-Gutho94

Coach
Messages
16,073

T.S Quint

Coach
Messages
14,818
There’s a few people responsible for this fiasco

What fiasco? A player coming off contract?

it’s certainly not desirable to allow so much power to the player and his manager

No of course it's not desirable. No club wants to give players options in the player's favour.
But sometimes you just have to do something you don't want in order to sign the player you do want.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,317
There’s a few people responsible for this fiasco, strangely not the Orrs , understand this will probably mean 50 responses from Pou, but it’s certainly not desirable to allow so much power to the player and his manager
He is off contract ffs. Should we match whatever rival clubs are offering him? Some of them are more desperate than we are.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,317
Funny you should mention that… this article mentions it a couple of times too.

"The Eels have only got themselves to blame for Brown currently being a free agent with the club agreeing to insert two get out clauses in his eight-year contract until the end of 2031."

Because every star player wants to lock himself in for eight years on the cheap. If only we told him to take it or leave it, he would be stuck at our club on "$850k" (allegedly) forever! FFS ONEAIL!!!!

"In a further bizarre contract twist, Brown has another get out clause prior to round 10 in season 2027 meaning he can tear up the final three years of his blue and gold contract from 2029 to 2031."

He won't have anything to tear up if he doesn't activate the option.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,317
What fiasco? A player coming off contract?



No of course it's not desirable. No club wants to give players options in the player's favour.
But sometimes you just have to do something you don't want in order to sign the player you do want.
And at the price you can afford. You could sign any player long term with zero player options if you paid him enough. But when 'enough' means overs then maybe it's not a good idea.
 

Latest posts

Top