Because one might be the dominant kicker without being the dominant playmaker, as we see in our team.
You could have a dominant kicker, playmaker, tackler, song singer, whatever the f**ker... you'd still only have one dominant half yes as a combination of all those things? I was just pointing out flaws in your arguing.
Just because they have freedom to switch sides inside the opposition 20 doesn't mean they aren't still generally playing left-right. Have a look at how they're set up for Paulo's try:
https://youtu.be/tjOrFf2Ewrs?t=116
Of course we'll stick with it - every club uses their halves this way. Left and right from their goal line to the opposition 20 and then freedom to overload one side close to the opposition line. The only exceptions are the Cowboys (who split their 1 and 6) and the Dogs (who often use a middle forward at first receiver on shift plays).
Split halves when you are hitting the ball up for half a set doesn't mean shit because it's just one-out hit-ups, so other players tend to stick in their defensive roles in case there is a quick turnover.
I'll give you that Norman is predominant left sided player, he does move behind the ruck when the right side play is on though, but how about you rewind your video to 1.28 and see how they are set up. Do they have the freedom to switch sides, or is it they have the freedom to split sides?
I agree he's a weak defender, but he's already better than Sandow, and he is still very young (22 in December). He will improve. Won't he? :?
You know who was also a weak defender, but already better than Sandow 2012-2015 and was young (23) and who could have improved. Chris f**king Sandow!