perverse
Referee
- Messages
- 27,533
I don't get it, is your point that sticking with a bad coach is better than looking for a good one? That it takes 6 years to make the evaluation?The thing is though, that there's not a strong correlation between rotating the coaching staff a lot & success.
In the NRL stability and success tend to be closely linked. And the overall strength of the organisation is linked with success. I think it's actually good that they don't just immediately leap to "well it's all the coach's fault" and push them out the door the second things start going a bit bad. That's what the Tigers do. Titans. Eels before and (I am willing to bet) after Brad Arthur.
It took us 6 years, and we still didn't sack the guy. He had to sack himself! Why did he have a 12th-or-better clause in year one of his newest contract, and then carte blanche after that??? If 13th isn't good enough in 2024, why is it acceptable in 2025? The guy just got a huge payout because we can't write a contract to save ourselves. It's f**king insane, hopeless management.
Are we just going to sit around for 6 years with the next guy until he sacks himself too? How long does a coach get? It's been plainly evident this guy wasn't up to par for years and years. I'm all for stability, but I'm not for attaching ourselves to a rotting corpse and hoping it springs to life. All I can say is full credit to the guy for having the balls to do what our management couldn't.


