Yeah Tapine is still the worst loss. On the flip side, he took a while to come good at Canberra, and was always a middling back rower at best. The big leap came as a lock/prop. My understanding is that us losing him was simply due to Canberra paying him more, but had we paid what it took to keep him the ROI initially (paging Dr Dr) would have been quite poor. No one is saying this shit is easy.
Also part of why these losses turn out to be gutting is that there’s now a bit of a trend of these forwards who were okay to good for us going on to be good to great elsewhere, and not a lot of examples of this happening in reverse.
Is this just a coincidence, or do these players need to leave to fulfil their potential?
If so. Why?
Of course none of us were crying about Josh King leaving at the time. But also, we’re not the ones close enough to the situation to really know whether or not we SHOULD keep him. King going to Melbourne for example was just a personal recommendation to Bellyache from Tim Glasby: Basically a “you’ll love this kid, he trains so hard, he has a lot more to give.” So it was obvious he was a keeper to a guy who worked with him every day, just not to people still affiliated with the Knights. Why?