DiegoNT
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,378
I think a lot of people are forgetting Burgess pre-2014, he was good, real good. He was also inconsistent, dropped balls and gave away a lot of penalties though.
I'd definitely agree with this. If he'd left for union at the beginning of 2014 i would of almost considered his time at Souths as a borderline flop. Even after a handful of games into the 2014 many souths fans wished he'd just go asap as he'd seemingly gaven up and wasn't putting in. Then in the last 20 weeks off 2014 he finally started dominating, and all the investment payed off.
Sonny's first stint with bulldogs was actually similar. People talk about him dominating in 2004, but he was more of an impact player of the bench. People forget that he was part of a bulldogs pack that contained Price, o'meley, mason, ryam, reni matua and asotasi all in Career best form. His remaining time at the bulldogs was plagued by injuries, inconsistentsy and suspension. When he finally looked to be living up to his potential and finally paying off on all that investment bulldogs put into him he ran off amd joined union, leaving bulldogs to collect the spoon. That's why he's still hated at Belmore.
I don't think his time at roosters was so dominate (simalar to the overstatement of Sam's 'dominance'), he took a while to get going in 2013, but by the back end of the season he was great, but in 2014 he didn't seem as interested, and he played incredibly limp in his final game. Its should also be noted that roosters finished exactly the same on 2015 without him.
Both are great players who have their ups and downs and strengths and weaknesses, to say one is better then the other is ridiculous, why can't people just enjoy both.
Last edited: