typicalfan
Coach
- Messages
- 15,488
The hit on Ackerman and what happened the other night are chalk and cheese.Andrew Ackerman is spot on.
The hit on Ackerman and what happened the other night are chalk and cheese.Andrew Ackerman is spot on.
Nope. People are going to die playing tough contact sports thats just a factAndrew Ackerman is spot on.
with his SHOULDERIt wasn’t a shoulder charge, it was a push!
Andrew Ackerman is spot on.
tuesday night 6 pmSo when does old mate go to the judiciary? (I remember reading on the NRL website they're bring it forward or something to allow the teams to prep for the GF).
didn`t even knock him off his feet.
He barely knocked him off balance.
I watched it again and he was off his feet. (was cheering cos Billy stopped a try)You merkins are drunk.
I've seen a lot of people say that it's a "clear", "text book" or any other adjective shoulder charge. If that were the case there wouldn't be so much conjecture about it.
On the day of this game,I heard on ABC Grandstand that if there are any charges,they will be delt with in 24 hours...which was to be on Sunday. Because Bill has to get his (legal) defense in order,I think the NRL must have given him till tonight.So when does old mate go to the judiciary? (I remember reading on the NRL website they're bring it forward or something to allow the teams to prep for the GF).
Pretty sure the nrl said they weren't bringing it forwardOn the day of this game,I heard on ABC Grandstand that if there are any charges,they will be delt with in 24 hours...which was to be on Sunday. Because Bill has to get his (legal) defense in order,I think the NRL must have given him till tonight.
I'm assuming 'Bump' is an afl term. The NRL won't be defining something that doesn't exist in their game.I guess this will come down to the Nrl determining what a shoulder charge actually is and the difference to a bump. As it stands the rule talks about the contact being forceful and the attempted use of the players arms. Currently every man and his dog has a personal opinion on what they think a shoulder charge should be based on where they live, who they support and there personal life experience. The Nrl are in a bind because either decision will be met with cries of bias.
My personal opinion is that billy will successfully argue his right arm was attempting to wrap Feki up and that it falls into the “bump” category. The fallout from the decision will cause the Nrl to define the difference between a bump and shoulder charge and when and how they are considered. It would be terrible to see wingers and centers being charged with shoulder charges for taking out attacking players going for the ball.
Pretty sure the nrl said they weren't bringing it forward
I'm assuming 'Bump' is an afl term. The NRL won't be defining something that doesn't exist in their game.
When I bump my cup of tea it spills on the table a bit. If what slater did is a ' bump' then my cup of tea would be through the wall scalding my neighbours cat.
Yep. Lets see how the filfth defend that....
Fair enough.Well firstly, you need stronger walls in your house. Secondly, it’s a cat so you can thank me later.
Bump, collision, drop the shoulder, body check what ever you want to call it. This decision can open a can of worms. My point was speed can’t be the only difference between a bump and shoulder charge. Players get taken out every week attempting to make a play at the ball. To rub all those players out for 2 weeks (200 points) if there shoulder hits another player seems excessive.