"Could anything different be done? You will find this situation was handled in the safest possible manner maintaining a duty of care to himself, player Feki and his team."
Is he claiming Slater protected Feki from self harm? Seems to be a common theme for Storm players...
I think the NRL counsel might have been suggesting slater actually try and make a tackleFrom nrl.com
7.20pm: "It could not be said that player Slater was careless for not getting his left arm in any other position," says Ghabar.
Slater's representative is making a couple of key points. Firstly that initial contact in the tackle was made with Slater's pec, not his shoulder. Secondly that Feki changed his direction which meant Slater had no alternative - given his speed - than to make the contact he did.
"Could anything different be done? You will find this situation was handled in the safest possible manner maintaining a duty of care to himself, player Feki and his team.
"What else could he have done?
"Is he (NRL counsel Anthony La Surdo) seriously suggesting player Slater let him run over him? Or let him score?"
7.13pm: Slater's lawyer Nick Ghabar talks the judiciary panel through the tackle.
"Player Feki is carrying the ball with both hands then puts the ball in his left hand. Player Feki's eyes and head has turned at this point to look directly at Slater and moves towards him. A collision is now imminent."
This is what scares me thoughI’ve not seen anything at all that factual that should let him off.
Are these lawyers getting paid by the minute?
"... both his arms..."From the blog on nrl.com -
7.42pm: Judiciary chairman Geoff Bellew has asked panel members to consider the following.
1. Was there forceful contact with the shoulder or upper arm? Bellew says if your answer is no, then he is not guilty.
If you answer yes you need to consider:
2. Was the forceful contact made without Slater using or attempting to use both his arms including his hands to tackle or otherwise take hold of the opposing player.
7.35pm: Bellew has recalled everyone, and is telling the panel members that the emotion around Slater and the fact it's a grand final on the line needs to be completely irrelevant in their determination.
Cleary it’s yes for number 1.From the blog on nrl.com -
7.42pm: Judiciary chairman Geoff Bellew has asked panel members to consider the following.
1. Was there forceful contact with the shoulder or upper arm? Bellew says if your answer is no, then he is not guilty.
If you answer yes you need to consider:
2. Was the forceful contact made without Slater using or attempting to use both his arms including his hands to tackle or otherwise take hold of the opposing player.
It'll be funny if he's suspended and Storm win anyway.