Not surprising decision really given how the NRL operate. Just change the rule when it suits. Their case that it was somehow Fekis fault is almost as funny as the Rabbits attempt to blame the Chooks for the photo scandal.
And yet Napa was banned for a head clash and when he argued that it was because the ball carrier changed direction he was laughed at.
The NRL will get the Storm home and have their fairytale
No, contact with the head is still illegal.Welp, there's your precedent.. feel free to decapitate the bloke running ball with nothing but your shoulder, just grab something before hand
Also are they saying the Slater tackle was actually a legal tackle and should not have even been a penalty? Are they now saying the penalty was incorrect? The statement seemed to say Feki was more at fault which is ridiculous.
Yes
He was penalised for a shoulder charge and the judiciary said it wasn't a shoulder charge.
So open slather this weekend.
just wait for a penalty for a shoulder charge in the grand final. The silo will collapse.The Chook Pen is a salt mine tonight.
Great stuff.
Almost. Fingerson wasnt convicted.For all the wailing and gnashing of teeth from Roosters fans, only one team will be putting a convicted sex offender on the park this Sunday, and it’s not the boys in purple.
Your rooster obsession is flattering.The Chook Pen is a salt mine tonight.
Great stuff.
For all the wailing and gnashing of teeth from Roosters fans, only one team will be putting a convicted sex offender on the park this Sunday, and it’s not the boys in purple.