typicalfan
Coach
- Messages
- 15,488
I am not fully across the precedent regarding similar plays. Have all players been suspended to this point? If no then what got them off? Could Storm use this too?But will he be suspended as per the rules?
I am not fully across the precedent regarding similar plays. Have all players been suspended to this point? If no then what got them off? Could Storm use this too?But will he be suspended as per the rules?
Agree but of course the inherent danger comes into it.
The shoulder charge law exists for player safety. Feki was not put in a harmful position by Slater. That brings into question why he is being charged under this law.
If it's purely because he led with his shoulder, Slater can argue why he was put in that situation - saving a try while preserving his own safety, without endangering the attacker.
• The contact is forceful, and;
• The player did not use, or attempt to use, his arms (including his hands) to tackle or otherwise take hold of the opposing player.
"As a game, we are committed to outlawing the shoulder charge, and we believe these changes will make it easier for us to do so," Mr Canavan said.
"Should a player make forceful contact and in the process fail to use or attempt to use his arms to do so, he will be charged with a shoulder charge."
I am not fully across the precedent regarding similar plays. Have all players been suspended to this point? If no then what got them off? Could Storm use this too?
Should have been binned.A legal tackle wouldn't have stopped the try - so Slater used the only tackle that could - a 'charging' tackle,leading with his 'shoulder'. The angle of approach or the inherent danger have absolutely nothing to do with it. Neither does him 'bracing' ( of course you brace before a collision). The argument Storm will make, I assume, is that his right arm got there simultaneously. But really his right arm was just pushing to assist the shoulder, and it didn't connect. All in all it was a brilliant f**king tackle. It just wan't a legal one according to the rules as they stand. Nobody complained about the penalty when it was blown.
Hodges actually had a defence which was totally disgraceful but still technically was able to be held up in the judiciary - as I recall Aiden Guerra went in there and took full responsibility for the tackle and said he put himself in that position on purpose to milk a penalty. What's Billy going to make Feki do? Go in there and say he used his psychic powers to make Slater shoulder charge him? If they let Slater off, it would be a absolute disgrace the likes we've never seen in the game, not in the last decade atleast.Should he be suspended? Absolutely.
Will he get suspended?
Not a chance.
After Hodges a couple of years ago it’s obvious they’ll do anything to get their favourites to play, regardless of what they’ve done.
They’ll let him off no doubt in my mind.Hodges actually had a defence which was totally disgraceful but still technically was able to be held up in the judiciary - as I recall Aiden Guerra went in there and took full responsibility for the tackle and said he put himself in that position on purpose to milk a penalty. What's Billy going to make Feki do? Go in there and say he used his psychic powers to make Slater shoulder charge him? If they let Slater off, it would be a absolute disgrace the likes we've never seen in the game, not in the last decade atleast.
https://www.nrl.com/news/2017/02/04/nrl-statement-on-shoulder-charge/
Here are the highlights.
Strike one and two there.
Tough stance that one. They are committed people!
There you have it, fairly black and white.
did the commentators mention Slater much tonight?
did the commentators mention Slater much tonight?
Looks like he did something similar a few years ago in the same position, against the same team and quite possibly against the same guy! Can anyone confirm if that was Feki?
You really couldn't make this stuff up.
Unbelievable.Yeah that’s Feki