Sharks/Newtown Divorce ??

[2 True Blues]

Which points do you believe are not relevant ??? Not most, which ones !!!

 

[bluebag43]

Captain Jack Sparrow, Newtown will honour their agreements and pay all their players, as they have always done. I hope this clarifies the situation for you!

 

[Nuffs]

but will they pay for the sharks players who have been frequently played in PL? that's what I am so confused about. unsure of what Sparrow thinks

 

[bluebag43]

If they are contracted Cronulla players, Cronulla pays as simple as that!

 

[Nuffs]

hence the problem that i have with this year. newtown are only paying for around 6 of this weeks team

at the start of the year, i was under the impression that newtown would be compensating sharks for using our players. but this hasn't happened. i think bad management again

but as i said, my big problem is the fact that we are paying for our contracted players even though they're playing for newtown

 

[bluebag43]

What about the Cronulla Flegg players from last year, Newtown are paying to play Jim Beam Cup!

Have you factored them into your considerations?

 

[2 True Blues]

Missing the point as usual....surely not.....( how much money did the sharks save in not paying for a whole team, training, coaching, etc. ). How many players were retained by the use of the Jim Beam squad when these players would have been lost to the club otherwise. Surely you are not this naive ???

How have Cronulla been hard done by, ( Is this your point ??? ) They have cheaply purchased how many players from us that now and in the near future will benefit your club.

What is your point kid ???

 

[Special K]

They have cheaply purchased how many players from us that now and in the near future will benefit your club.

Pure rubbish.

Our club signed those three players. If you think our club paired up with the Jets for Stosic, Looloo and Manua then you are more backwards than I thought was possible. Our club could have just as easily signed those 3 players and had nothing to do with the jets.

They didn't come cheap - they came at the rate you pay players of their age and backgrounds. It is called market value, which is what we paid for them. Any club could have signed them. Face facts - players want to play in the big time which is what we put forward to them. It is no different to a club buying another clubs jersey flegg players. It is a business.

 

[2 True Blues]

Missing the point as usual....surely not.....( how much money did the sharks save in not paying for a whole team, training, coaching, etc. ). How many players were retained by the use of the Jim Beam squad when these players would have been lost to the club otherwise ?.

How were the Sharks hard done by as some individuals are implying ???

 

[2 True Blues]

Im off to work now and honestly couldnt give a flyin one. Dont bother answering. It doesnt really matter !!

 

[Special K]

Missing the point as usual....surely not.....( how much money did the sharks save in not paying for a whole team, training, coaching, etc. ). How many players were retained by the use of the Jim Beam squad when these players would have been lost to the club otherwise ?.

How were the Sharks hard done by as some individuals are implying ???

Look at the jets side - full of sharks players. They could end up in the grand final.

How are the jets hard done by as some individuals are implying???