Why not? If bowlers were in the know and went along with it, then they are no different to Smith
IMO I have thought the penalties were too harsh for the 3 outed, nothings changed , but protecting others who were involved is just as bad (if that was the case). Then again, there are other nations who would have done the same Im sure, but I thought we aint them when it comes to ethics??
How many do you want to ban? The whole XI? What about the 12th man and substitute fielder from A-Grade?
I'm you've seen the footage of Khawaja watching Bancroft pour sugar into his pocket in the SCG dressing room during the Ashes. So its not just a bowler thing. Most would have known. Watch Handscomb's reaction on the walkie-talkie during the Capetown test when he gets word about the sandpaper on the big screen.
I know where you are coming from. Its an uneven punishment. But if we are going past the point of banning the offender (Bancroft) as well as the captain, vice and coach (He wasn't banned but he found his own way out) then we wouldn't even have a team to field. The rot starts at the head so cut it off.
On another note. Go back the year prior to the India tour. Smith looks to our dressing room to get information on an LBW referral. Kohli catches him in the act and Smith walks. I was surprised more wasn't said about that at the time. I didn't envision we'd do the sandpaper thing but it was clear in hindsight the team culture had devolved.