RWB
Bench
- Messages
- 2,814
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that anyone can play origin but the argument I have here is that there's plenty of players who have spent a large amount of their life in either living in QLD or NSW after their family migrated from another country.
Let me take some examples;
Nathan Cayless
- Born in Sydney
- Played his junior Rugby League for Wenworthville
- Represented NSW at junior rep level
- Chose to play for NZ
Jaryd Hayne
- Born in Sydney
- Played his junior Rugby League for Cambelltown & Cabramatta
- Represented NSW at junior rep level
- Originally chose to play for Fiji but now plays for Australia
Now no one can sit here and tell me that these guys wouldn't bleed for the NSW origin jersey, growing up in NSW, representing NSW in junior rep comps & watching it on TV every year they're probably just as passionate about the game as anyone.
However both have very proud family heritage and at some point had to make a tough decision on who they were going to play for (Obviously under the current rules choosing any country other than Australia makes you ineligible for State of Origin). I suggest that the international game and SOO game would be better off for allowing both the guys above to represent either New Zealand or Fiji whilst also representing the State they grew up in.
The criteria would need to be very strict, NZ kids who move over here at the age of 16-17 to look for a chance in the NRL wouldn't be allowed, they'd need to spend a significant amount of time in their respective states junior Rugby League system. Without giving it a lot of thought I think the criteria would have to read something like;
Lets face it there's already some poaching going on and it's not doing the games credibility any good as it's making a mockery of the rules. The lines of what's morally right or wrong have been blurred by both states and there needs to be either a big overhaul or the rules or much stricter enforcement and despite years of pressure from fans we know the latter isn't going to happen.
Now I know people will say how can you play for NSW and not Australia, NSW is Australia but I'll leave you with one more example and a thought to ponder;
Petero Civoniceva
- Born in Fiji, moved to Australia before he was even a 1 year old
- Played his junior Rugby League for Redcliffe
- Represented QLD at junior rep level
- Chose to play for Australia
Is the notion that you play for the state in which you grew up in but you play for the country in which your family has a rich history and heritage that ridiculous?
SOO is better off for having blokes like Petero & Hayne who both undoubtedly love playing for their states but if given the choice to also play for Fiji wouldn't it be great to see these guys tear in at the end of the season and finally start to build the international game up to what it could be?
Thoughts?
Let me take some examples;
Nathan Cayless
- Born in Sydney
- Played his junior Rugby League for Wenworthville
- Represented NSW at junior rep level
- Chose to play for NZ
Jaryd Hayne
- Born in Sydney
- Played his junior Rugby League for Cambelltown & Cabramatta
- Represented NSW at junior rep level
- Originally chose to play for Fiji but now plays for Australia
Now no one can sit here and tell me that these guys wouldn't bleed for the NSW origin jersey, growing up in NSW, representing NSW in junior rep comps & watching it on TV every year they're probably just as passionate about the game as anyone.
However both have very proud family heritage and at some point had to make a tough decision on who they were going to play for (Obviously under the current rules choosing any country other than Australia makes you ineligible for State of Origin). I suggest that the international game and SOO game would be better off for allowing both the guys above to represent either New Zealand or Fiji whilst also representing the State they grew up in.
The criteria would need to be very strict, NZ kids who move over here at the age of 16-17 to look for a chance in the NRL wouldn't be allowed, they'd need to spend a significant amount of time in their respective states junior Rugby League system. Without giving it a lot of thought I think the criteria would have to read something like;
- Played junior Rugby League in respective state since the age of 12 or;
- Had residency in respective state since the age of 12
Lets face it there's already some poaching going on and it's not doing the games credibility any good as it's making a mockery of the rules. The lines of what's morally right or wrong have been blurred by both states and there needs to be either a big overhaul or the rules or much stricter enforcement and despite years of pressure from fans we know the latter isn't going to happen.
Now I know people will say how can you play for NSW and not Australia, NSW is Australia but I'll leave you with one more example and a thought to ponder;
Petero Civoniceva
- Born in Fiji, moved to Australia before he was even a 1 year old
- Played his junior Rugby League for Redcliffe
- Represented QLD at junior rep level
- Chose to play for Australia
Is the notion that you play for the state in which you grew up in but you play for the country in which your family has a rich history and heritage that ridiculous?
SOO is better off for having blokes like Petero & Hayne who both undoubtedly love playing for their states but if given the choice to also play for Fiji wouldn't it be great to see these guys tear in at the end of the season and finally start to build the international game up to what it could be?
Thoughts?