Reek_Havoc
Juniors
- Messages
- 559
Did I say that?
A real man admits when he is wrrrrrrrrong...
Your last few comments remind me of Shames. Take off those black and white goggles and admit defeat.
Did I say that?
FMD you are such a biased little princess it isn't funny. It's taken Gibbs 6 years to get to where he is now - 6 mostly frustrating years. Yet you are ready to immediately compare Gibbs (and Fulton) to Fifita based on their performances now.Tell you what sweet heart. I'll give you a chance to find a quote about me thinking anything of Pillow other than he would be a much better player in the second row before I start on you.
Fifita is a plodder. The bloke simply refuses to take hit ups when we are under the pump. This is all well and good if we've got a full catalogue of big boys, but this never happens. The guy didn't take a single hit up in the first 10 minutes of the Bulldogs game as a starting prop. In this time Fulton had gone full steam into the defence at least 3 times. This is embarrassing at best.
Luckily Gibbs took on his workload for him, or we'd have been embarrassed. I reckon he would be the only prop in first grade EVER, to not take a hit up in the first 10.
FMD you are such a biased little princess it isn't funny. It's taken Gibbs 6 years to get to where he is now - 6 mostly frustrating years. Yet you are ready to immediately compare Gibbs (and Fulton) to Fifita based on their performances now.
But seeing as you've compared Fifita to Gibbs princess, tell me why the plodder has 4x as many tackle breaks or 3x as many line breaks in less minutes than Gibbs, and averages more runs and the same number of tackles per minute on the field? Not bad for a plodder. Oh, no doubt all of those extra line breaks and tackle breaks are a result of Gibbs' and Fulton's work.
As I said at the time of that Dogs game, you came on here straight afterwards and criticised the f**k out of Fifita yet had not made a single comment about him the previous couple of weeks after he'd performed well in limited minutes off the bench. Yet one poor showing from a 20 year old rookie prop and that axe is sharpened and ready to grind yet again. And, several weeks after that Dogs game, you've still only got that one example to whinge about.
So very pathetic.
A real man admits when he is wrrrrrrrrong...
Your last few comments remind me of Shames. Take off those black and white goggles and admit defeat.
Oh, and why does Gibbs get 6 years to "come good", but Fifita doesn't? Why does Gibbs get to his mid-20s, but Fifita is denigrated at 20? Come on princess, explain your double standards. That's the whole point - you play favourites more than anybody on here.
I dunno, Daniela made Ayshford look pretty bad the other night. Westie might be onto something...its like how collis was made look bad because we dont attack to the right, but ayshford playing right center looked bad because he is bad.
I dunno, Daniela made Ayshford look pretty bad the other night. Westie might be onto something...
Sorry - how do the stats I've provided indicate that he plays off the back of other people's work? Just clear that up for us. All his runs, tackle breaks, line breaks, off-loads, tackles and so on are the result of other people's work are they? I was only kidding when I said you'd say that, but incredibly, you just have!
Oh, and why does Gibbs get 6 years to "come good", but Fifita doesn't? Why does Gibbs get to his mid-20s, but Fifita is denigrated at 20? Come on princess, explain your double standards. That's the whole point - you play favourites more than anybody on here.
Fifita still has a long way to go.. He is very undisciplined..given away a penalty or 2 at the wrong end of the field, and got a way with a few too.. I think with some more experience he will be a force...but not yet..
Westie, you're a bad judge on talent. You've bagged Moltzen, Ashyford and now Lui and Fafita. All have been playing well considering coming from (NYC). You can talk as much as you want on this but it's just jibberish.
You wrap Fulton and Collis, both were crap the last time they were with us. Fulton is playing solid this year but will probably still miss out when all forwards are fit.
What's your point?
Ok, I'll bite - can you point out one instance, other than the start of the Dogs match, where he hasn't played a front row role or had a crack. And you still haven't actually explained how his line breaks, tackle breaks, runs, off-loads etc come on the back of other players' work.Shall I make it simpler for you? He's not playing a front row role, while taking a front row position. For a man of his size, I find this unacceptable. I wouldn't care if he got pumped and didn't make metres, as long as he had a crack. The dude isn't even running when we need him. He's a luxury player at this stage, something we have too much of when we've got limited front row stocks. Consider it, everyone else has since the JV began.
So Fifita doesn't get to come good in first grade.....but you had no problem with Gibbs getting that long, despite years of mediocre at best production. Ok.....go magpies!Fifita does get till his mid-20s to come good. Just not in FG. Understand? There's a bunch of rough nuts in the reserve teams who may have less ability, but will perform to a far higher standard in FG in the department we desperately need. Go forward and intimidation!
Jesus your generalisation of this guy is incredible. So on top of all his metres, tackles, line breaks and so on coming on the back of other players', now they only come when we're up by 30 to boot - despite us being in that position just once this year! I suppose his performances against the Eels in a tight contest, against the Raiders in a come from behind victory and against the Roosters in a close match out at Campbelltown were aberrations.We don't need line breaks from our front row when we're up by 30. We need some knuckle heads who are going to save a game when we're in the trenches. No one can say they've ever considered Fifita capable of this.
Must I dumb everything down to alleviate your worries of favouritism?