miguel de cervantes
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,473
They could rebrand to World Rugby League.
that would be a classic
They could rebrand to World Rugby League.
(i) it is evident that WorldRugby does not like the word rugby being associated with rugby league. This is a clear as day indication that league should hold onto it and not give it up.
(ii) With the inclusion of rugby 7s in the olympics, people are going to wake up to the fact now more than ever that there are different rugbies. You will see more rugby 15s in the media, more frequent cases of the word "rugby" simply not being enough to know what one is talking about.
(iii) It goes both ways. Rugby league could, and should perhaps, and maybe even does advertise games as just "rugby" in developing markets. Having the word rugby in the name of the sport can be viewed as a positive thing.
(iv) "To separate from the Private School wankers would be disrespectful to our games history!!!!!" - never in my life have I thought of the word rugby in rugby league as being a link to private school wankers, or the establishment or whatever. It is just simply the name of the sport.
(v) French rugby league fought long and hard to regain the use of the word rugby. Losing this right in the first place did diddly squat to help the promotion of the sport. And to add to BODISGOD above, it has been ruled in France that union does not and cannot hold exclusive rights to the word rugby.
XIII Rugby/ Rugby13s?
I agree 'League' is the dumb word. I assume the original use of League was not meant to become the name of the sport.
Rah-rah ruckus
The oldest enmity in rugby league – the one with rugby union – has flared again. Most countries do not recognise them as separate sports, meaning league is denied funding, insurance and in some cases protection from intimidation and even – hello Sol Mokdad – jail. That was supposed to change with league, arm wrestling and poker due to be formally admitted to Sports Accord in Lucerne over the past few days. Alas, that was delayed and at the same time, reported insidethegame.biz. "A letter was subsequently sent to SportAccord by World Rugby calling for the RLIF not to be added". It appears the Rugby League International Federation does not know exactly what was in this letter – and has asked the former IRB to formally guarantee them it wasn't a hatchet job. "RLIF has received a written assurance from World Rugby that the concern which World Rugby has raised is with SportAccord and not with the RLIF application and therefore there is no reason for the RLIF application not to be approved at the November meeting," said League's CEO David Collier.
We have been calling ourselves Rugby League for over 120 years, let's just keep it that way!
If new people to our sport prefer to call it Rugby XIII or Game of XIII that's ok, but our official name should be Rugby League!
We have been calling ourselves Rugby League for over 120 years, let's just keep it that way!
If new people to our sport prefer to call it Rugby XIII or Game of XIII that's ok, but our official name should be Rugby League!
Just bypass using a town name
And become the World League ( Country Name )
That would not be the easiest choice for anyone outside of Australia.Edit: the easiest choice by far would be NRL Football but im not really a fan of that...
Sad week for International Rugby League. Australia abuses the unfair advantage it has in having 15 professional fulltime clubs by picking a player on residency, and the coach of England successfully stops Samoa selecting a fit and eligible athlete. I know many of you are passionate about rugby league getting IOC and SportAccord recognition but I don't think it deserves it. It's not yet an international sport in the true sense of the term. These things don't happen in organisations and communities ready to join the global family of sports, sorry. Rugby league is run by 16 coaches in Australia and New Zealand, not by a governing body.
http://www.rlif.com/article/1649/frustrating-delay-to-international-recognitionRLIF has been left frustrated by delays to the process for international recognition by SportAccord
RLIF Committed to AIMS membership at November meeting.
RLIF was disappointed that its application for membership of AIMS first made in 2013 was further delayed by the recent changes within SportAccord
Rugby League's application had been assessed and confirmed as compliant and therefore was recommended to the SportAccord council to place before the 2016 General Assembly. However on the eve of the General Assembly RLIF, in common with other applicant sports, were informed that it was deemed to be necessary to take the recommended application to a forum of SportAccord in November rather than finalise the process on 22 April.
RLIF Chief Executive David Collier commented:
"RLIF is frustrated by the delay in our membership application but we continue to work with SportAccord to bring this process to a successful conclusion in November."
"RLIF has received a written assurance from World Rugby that the concern which World Rugby has raised is with SportAccord and not with the RLIF application and therefore there is no reason for the RLIF application not to be approved at the November meeting. Sadly the delay creates additional cost and hardship to sport but we look forward to a successful outcome at the latest by the November meeting."
RLIF has sent its congratulations to Mr Patrick Baumann on his election as the new President of SportAccord and looks forward to working with Mr Baumann.