What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Spring 2017

Lemon Squash

First Grade
Messages
8,886
Next was Foundry who had bugger all chance anyway.

Yeh but just having a full field makes it more of a spectacle imo... + if I owned the horse that just missed a start but was next in line even if it was Wazn I’d still want it to get a run
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,922
Yeh but just having a full field makes it more of a spectacle imo... + if I owned the horse that just missed a start but was next in line even if it was Wazn I’d still want it to get a run

If it was a strong year maybe. As it is half these plodders would be lucky to win a Mornington Cup!
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
I'm just a noob here fellas so help me out... Red Cardinal won the Belmont Cup in a time quicker than last years Melbourne Cup. And quicker than anyone except Protectionist since 2002.

Same length race at 3200m.

Is that relevant? I know how pacing can be slow in a 2 mile race but it can't be a bad thing.
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,620
I'm just a noob here fellas so help me out... Red Cardinal won the Belmont Cup in a time quicker than last years Melbourne Cup. And quicker than anyone except Protectionist since 2002.

Same length race at 3200m.

Is that relevant? I know how pacing can be slow in a 2 mile race but it can't be a bad thing.

Not relevant homie,can't compare times from different race tracks in different countries run on different surfaces(slow,good fast etc etc)
 

Lemon Squash

First Grade
Messages
8,886
I'm just a noob here fellas so help me out... Red Cardinal won the Belmont Cup in a time quicker than last years Melbourne Cup. And quicker than anyone except Protectionist since 2002.

Same length race at 3200m.

Is that relevant? I know how pacing can be slow in a 2 mile race but it can't be a bad thing.

One of TJ Smith’s great quotes was ‘Time only matters when you are in jail’

The importance of times in racing is subjective, some people stand by them while some people like TJ pay little attention.

Personally there are so many variables in racing that times themselves aren’t overly relevant imo. Tracks, weather, wind, bias, patterns etc

I pay more attention to the times clocked on that particular day.. so for instance if on the day Red Cardinal won if the other winners on the day were clocking time also then you would expect him to have done so as well. If it had of won in slow time yet all the other horses were clocking quick times then I would be a little concerned.

Probably just further confused you but to answer your question I would say that it’s definitely not a bad thing if he ran time, but I wouldn’t let it be a major factor in your overall decision when doing form for the race.

Lemon out..:sunglasses: :lemon:
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
Thanks Lemon.

Mirroring last years quinella of Heartbreak City and Almandin, perhaps a Marmelo-Red Cardinal 1-2 @ $85 is worth $100.
 

Lemon Squash

First Grade
Messages
8,886
Very open field this year.. important stat is that there has been 97 overseas horses try and win the MC without a lead up run in Aus and they have all failed.

In saying that many have been close including Heartbreak City last year.

I think this year might be the year the hoodoo gets broken, I actually don’t mind some of the longer shot internationals.
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,620
Times don't mean much tbh,horses like Here De Angels and Diatribe hold track records at Caulfield, Here De Angels wouldn't get within 80 lengths off Placid Ark and Schillaci over 1100m,Diatribe wouldn't get within 200 lengths of Gailee,Tobin Bronze and Leilani over 2400m.

Frankel doesn't hold any track records and he's the greatest horse in history.
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
157,680
Very open field this year.. important stat is that there has been 97 overseas horses try and win the MC without a lead up run in Aus and they have all failed.

In saying that many have been close including Heartbreak City last year.

I think this year might be the year the hoodoo gets broken, I actually don’t mind some of the longer shot internationals.
Im thinking that way as well Lem.

My two rules for the cup are the horse has had to run a race in Australia and if they run in a cup and don’t win I never ever give them another chance.

It’s served me well for well for 20 years but I think I might be breaking that rule tis year. Because let’s face it this Field is Aids.

Edit I did break that rule for Fiorente because he should of won the year before and he was airborne. So I have broken it once
 

Lemon Squash

First Grade
Messages
8,886
Im thinking that way as well Lem.

My two rules for the cup are the horse has had to run a race in Australia and if they run in a cup and don’t win I never ever give them another chance.

It’s served me well for well for 20 years but I think I might be breaking that rule tis year. Because let’s face it this Field is Aids.

Edit I did break that rule for Fiorente because he should of won the year before and he was airborne. So I have broken it once

Have to admit I haven't had a real in depth look at the form yet but had a bit of a squiz at some replays last night.

Marmelo, Wall of Fire and Johann Vermeers are the obvious from the lead up runs here in Aus but I think some of the other internationals have better overseas form.

I'm like you (and most punters) so if they haven't had a lead up run in Aus I put a pen through them straight away as history tells you they can't win... also as you mentioned same case if they have run in the cup and not won then come back for a second crack you can rule them out.

It's just over the last couple of years we've seen a Fiorente buck the trend, Americain imo would have won a second if he had a better run.Red Cadeaux almost won first up in his first crack then consistently came back and performed + Heartbreak City last year if you take out Almandin then he bolts in. So imo the hoodoo is going to get broken soon and this year with half the field suffering from severe bouts of Leprosy I think its as good a chance as ever.

l'm actually warming to a horse which is actually breaking 3 of my Melbourne Cup rules! Max Dynamite.... he breaks the above 2 rules plus he is an 8 year old and once again history tells you that 8 year olds don't win Melbourne Cups.

Just something about this horse I think he is flying under the radar a bit, even though he and Frankie wiped out half the field 2 years ago he was the run of the race by a mile, nothing made up significant ground except him.

I watched Max Dynamites last run before he came over here it was in a shitty little handicap race in Ireland, so not exactly Melbourne Cup form but jeez he just absolutely destroyed them. It was a 3400 metre race and the jockey didn't even really let him go, just tacked up beautifully and when he let him go it was all over..

I think his age is offset by the fact he is so lightly raced, he's only had 4 starts since the 2015 cup including a 14 month spell. I think the fact he is coming back for a second crack is offset by the fact he actually has less weight this year than in 2015 when most horses rise in the weights.

I just think the connections wouldn't bring him out here if they didn't think he would perform well... or more likely after all that waffle he will probably come out and run like Praecido.

Tiberian is the other one over the odds I like its form barrier puts me off a bit though.
 

Leber

Bench
Messages
4,078
Big Duke had no luck in the MV cup and likes the trip. I reckon he's a big smokey.

Almandin, Big Duke, Marmelo and Wall of fire for mine.

I'm also very interested in seeing if single gaze gets the two miles or not
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
157,680
Have to admit I haven't had a real in depth look at the form yet but had a bit of a squiz at some replays last night.

Marmelo, Wall of Fire and Johann Vermeers are the obvious from the lead up runs here in Aus but I think some of the other internationals have better overseas form.

I'm like you (and most punters) so if they haven't had a lead up run in Aus I put a pen through them straight away as history tells you they can't win... also as you mentioned same case if they have run in the cup and not won then come back for a second crack you can rule them out.

It's just over the last couple of years we've seen a Fiorente buck the trend, Americain imo would have won a second if he had a better run.Red Cadeaux almost won first up in his first crack then consistently came back and performed + Heartbreak City last year if you take out Almandin then he bolts in. So imo the hoodoo is going to get broken soon and this year with half the field suffering from severe bouts of Leprosy I think its as good a chance as ever.

l'm actually warming to a horse which is actually breaking 3 of my Melbourne Cup rules! Max Dynamite.... he breaks the above 2 rules plus he is an 8 year old and once again history tells you that 8 year olds don't win Melbourne Cups.

Just something about this horse I think he is flying under the radar a bit, even though he and Frankie wiped out half the field 2 years ago he was the run of the race by a mile, nothing made up significant ground except him.

I watched Max Dynamites last run before he came over here it was in a shitty little handicap race in Ireland, so not exactly Melbourne Cup form but jeez he just absolutely destroyed them. It was a 3400 metre race and the jockey didn't even really let him go, just tacked up beautifully and when he let him go it was all over..

I think his age is offset by the fact he is so lightly raced, he's only had 4 starts since the 2015 cup including a 14 month spell. I think the fact he is coming back for a second crack is offset by the fact he actually has less weight this year than in 2015 when most horses rise in the weights.

I just think the connections wouldn't bring him out here if they didn't think he would perform well... or more likely after all that waffle he will probably come out and run like Praecido.

Tiberian is the other one over the odds I like its form barrier puts me off a bit though.
If old Max runs top 3 tomorrow poor old Hiney could be homeless by tomorrow night.
 

Sphagnum

Coach
Messages
13,257
In a race where you need to narrow dowb the pool of chances you should stick pretty rigidly to all your rules. Otherwise you end up spending a fortune taking 10 of the merkins and dont even end up with a placing

Fwiw im.backing wall of fire and taking hartnell, almandin, marmelo and red cardinal in the exotics.

I picked red cardinal out when i saw it win that seppo race and the rest i think are pretty obvious.

If lane rides hartnell cold and gets him clear air at the clock tower he is the one to beat imo. All his starts over 3200 he has done way to much work and still run well enough to suggest he does run the trip. His wfa form is better than all of these with the only other one who has any wfa form being humidor who im pretty certain will NOT run the trip.

However im not confident enough that he wont make hartnell work to take up a position so im sticking with wall of fire because it was a terrific lead up run, the form stacked up beautifully and surely you dont get 'willowed' in the only race in the world that leathery little midget hasnt won yet
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,922
Big Duke had no luck in the MV cup and likes the trip. I reckon he's a big smokey.

Almandin, Big Duke, Marmelo and Wall of fire for mine.

I'm also very interested in seeing if single gaze gets the two miles or not

Even thought it's a lottery race I can't have it. Not when Darren Weir who trained the horse did't want to run it- wanted to head to the smaller Cup in a few weeks, forget the name. That tells me something isn't 100% right.
 

Latest posts

Top