Stats Thread

[cerberus]

interesting read,galloways stats are something like skando's use to be. good meters and miss some tackles .

 

[innsaneink]

why did you post the article then?

Its clear why I posted it, answer the question.

 

[madunit]

You posted the article to try and discredit the use of stats, and indirectly, me.

Not that you'd own up to that, because you're a softcock.

The article states quite clearly that the NRL Stats team are quite reliable and should be the source used for all NRL stats, as their stats are used by all clubs.

But because you are holding a grudge against me over something pissy, you feel the need to hijack threads to continue with your pissy snide attacks.

 

[themanonthehill]

Ink's been quite chipper since the ALP got in
No doubt he's over the moon they're axing work for the dole

 

[innsaneink]

You posted the article to try and discredit the use of stats, and indirectly, me.

Not that you'd own up to that, because you're a softcock.

The article states quite clearly that the NRL Stats team are quite reliable and should be the source used for all NRL stats, as their stats are used by all clubs.

But because you are holding a grudge against me over something pissy, you feel the need to hijack threads to continue with your pissy snide attacks.

LMFAO!

Wow, paranoid much?

It was an article in one of the main league websites.

An article about stats, posted in a thread on stats.

Mr Rod Allen may be trying to discredit stats, or maybe hes highliting a discrepancy....discredit you...:roll:

:lol:

LOL unit, nice to see Im under your skin....you tool.

You still havent answered the question, how can I miscomprehend it when i havent even commented on it?

 

[madunit]

So you won't explain why you posted that article?

That in itself fails to prove any paranoia, it further proves my point.

Moreso when you consider you spend so much time following me around this entire forum to start pissy fights like this all the time.

Do you have anything else you'd like to piss and moan about?

 

[innsaneink]

LOL...I asked you a simple question, yet you dance and sidestep it, cant admit youre wrong. Weak as piss.

So you won't explain why you posted that article?

4th line, post 25

play dumb, predictable and standard...it suits you

 

[ride the tiger]

The article itself, which innsaneink and yourself have failed to comprehend isn't that the NRL stats are wrong, only that the Fox Sports stats aren't very accurate.

As i read at a kindergarden level (due to an undiagnosed case of dsylexai) i stupidly thought that article was about discrepancies between the two & maybe interpretations (rather than errors) cause this.

But now ive seen your high level of intellect prove why Ink was so stupid for posting a stats article in a stats thread i'll have to concede that my comprehension skills aren't a strong suit of mine & as im always willing to learn, could you please show me where it says nrl stats are correct and fox stats are wrong?