Timmah said::lol:
OVP said:This guy doesnt give a rats arse about the game, and quite frankly NEVER did. This is why he is entrenched in the Bulldog's coaching position. They care about THEM, and thats it.
OVP said:Commentator to Steve Folkes when the Filthy Ones arent in the semis ...\
Who do you think will win the comp, Steve ? Or maybe you could even name the Grand Finalists.
Steve : "I couldnt give a damn"
Yeah !! Damn Straight !! Lets give the control of NSW to a JOKE of a so-called "professional". This guy doesnt give a rats arse about the game, and quite frankly NEVER did. This is why he is entrenched in the Bulldog's coaching position. They care about THEM, and thats it. If you dont get that by now, then why the Hell did they join Superleague ?
Rocco said:nope cant see the reason why he is a extremely professional and successful coach.
the premiership that you puppies undeservidly won in 04 should have been the roosters premiership and what have the puppies done ever since making the 4 in recent years? they easily get beaten whilst other teams just put up a fight.
so therefore steve folkes is a sh*t coach
Chief_Chujo said::lol: Little rich coming from a Rorters fans.
"Wah wah raise the cap or we will take you to court"
Yeah that's for the good of the game :roll:
mattyg said:Thats because he coaches Bulldogs.
Care to explain why Roosters deserved the premiership in 04? We usually last well into the finals series...2003/2004/2006 are good examples. Well much further than the Broncos have lasted in the few finals series' previous to 2006 at least.
Rocco said:you tards claim he is the best coach in the nrl. he hasnt yet proven himself to be as one of the best.
and the roosters were by far the best team on the night and had the possession all to themselves but dodgy ref decisions cost them the premiership
mattyg said:Give him the chance to prove himself and he might. Thats what this thread is about moron. Anyway, i don't think he is the best coach in the NRL, i think Bellamy is. I rate Folkes and Bennet as =2nd.
Roosters were not the best team on the night, there were no dodgy decisions...in fact a few minor 50/50 things went the roosters way...i've watched the 04 GF DVD that many times i basically know the game off by heart. Roosters had possession big deal...if you can't crack the line you don't deserve to win no matter how much ball you have.
Rocco said:your very close with that. i dont agree with folkes being the 2nd best in the nrl. he is somewhere below 10th.
there were dodgy decisions in that game, finch didnt kick the ball out on the full. hazem el tragic scored a double movement try, minichiello's 2nd try should have been allowed and there were alot of other dodgy decisions there as well.
Rocco said:you tards claim he is the best coach in the nrl. he hasnt yet proven himself to be as one of the best.
and the roosters were by far the best team on the night and had the possession all to themselves but dodgy ref decisions cost them the premiership
mattyg said:.
- The Minichiello try was a clear double movement...Corey Hughes should not have had to make a decision in that case of who he should take. You can't run behind a decoy runner.
- Hazems Try wasn't a double movement, he was on top of the defenders at the time, and his momentum wasn't stopped. Fair Try