That shot deserved six weeks IMO. Big man to take on a rookie in his first NRL match and strike him the way he did.
IMO it was deliberate and not careless. Should be upgraded.
That shot deserved six weeks IMO. Big man to take on a rookie in his first NRL match and strike him the way he did.
IMO it was deliberate and not careless. Should be upgraded.
Holy sh*t,
After watching last nights game I am now convinced he is the biggest grub in the game. I always knew he was either a) a diver, or b) a massive softcock who left the field every chance he got, but now I know for sure he is just deadset f**ked.
After about the 17th forearm to the head 'tackle' he did last night, he got called to the ref. He sort of just shrugged his shoulders, effectively cutting off the ref, and walked off. Several attempts were made to bring him back, and he refused, more than once. Why the f**k was he still allowed on the field?
I was told this morning that he was cited twice for high shots? WTF?
1. Why wasn't he sent off.
2. How many weeks will he / should he get?
3. Is he ever actually injured?
4. Should he be playing Bowls or something instead (so that he doesn't get injured?
5. Why does Manly persist with a centre who struggles to play 80 minutes a week?
what a bunch of sooks. you'd back him to the hilt if he was yours - are any of you man enough to admit it?
That shot deserved six weeks IMO. Big man to take on a rookie in his first NRL match and strike him the way he did.
IMO it was deliberate and not careless. Should be upgraded.
what a bunch of sooks. you'd back him to the hilt if he was yours - are any of you man enough to admit it?
Does the name Justin Hodges ring a bell !!!1. Because the ref was weak, he should have got at least 10 in the bin.
2. Probably about 6. That tackle was the worst high tackle I've seen for ages, there was definitely intent.
3. Well last year he played 21 games, yet went down with injury probably about 40 times.
4. Playing bowls would require him to use his brain far too much.
5. Because they have no one else.
No way I would, we had Ennis and I hated him.... and Matai is 50 times as bad
5. Plays 80 minutes 98% of the time, didn't have a problem at all this year til he was collected high in the Titans match.
what a bunch of sooks. you'd back him to the hilt if he was yours - are any of you man enough to admit it?
No I wouldn't.
I was happy to go on record as saying Costigan is the worst thing that happened to our club at the time he was with us. He's a dirty, cheap-shot merchant that is also just a sh*t human.
Matai is worse than him.
i'm a kiwi and i hate the prick.
sorry mrs. matai, no offence intended for you.and i am sure Mattai probably would not like you either.........your point is....
sorry mrs. matai, no offence intended for you.
Agreed.
We dodged a bullet with Matai as well. Some years back, before he had fully established himself in first grade, his manager came to the Raiders and offered his services, but was met with a "thanks but no thanks".
I'm thankful every day that they made this decision.