yappy
Bench
- Messages
- 4,161
Whats the point of picking a player in a test squad if they had no intention in playing him in any matches?
Don't get me wrong I think Cummins being selected in the test squad is a joke.
So instead of being back in Australia and playing Sheild cricket so he can fullfil this 'potential' of his, he is in South Africa not playing cricket.
Now that they havn't played him in the Tour Match they almost have to play him in the 1st Test. Otherwise all they are doing is not giving him a chance to play proper cricket. He won't progress into a top class Test bowler by playing nothing but ODI and Giggle cricket.
Michael Beer was selected in the Test Squad was he not? He is playing Sheild cricket as we speak. If they had no intention of giving Pat Cummins game time then surely he would be back with NSW right now.
Agree with all of that, but you've forgotten about who picked the squad.
Cummins is a great talent but we simply aren't going that bad that we should be bringing an 18 year old kid with 9 wickets @45 into the team. No way will Clarke (and even with Invers in place he'll be making the call) play Cummins in front of the other 4 quicks he has at his disposal. That's why he didn't play Cummins in this game. He's played the test side bar Harris and the quicks are going head to head to take two (probably 1 with MJ pretty close to a lock) spots. Lyon will play and Beer is only there as a back up and because to not select him Hilditch would have conceded he never should have been picked in the first place.