JJ said:I've added a signature, just to remind you!
El Diablo said:you're the genius that couldn't find it
probably not the only thing you can't find either
aussies1st said:Hogg would have got smashed, Watson the same. There is no more supersub so we can't just sub him off cause thats not in the spirit of cricket.
JJ said:not that I couldn't, you just seem to enjoy finding them - thought it might be therapeutic for you - apparently not
JJ said:I didn't necessarily say under 6.
JJ said:if Pollock and McGrath had played, neither would have gone for 6...
JJ said:had your afternoon nap then?
JJ said:the quality of pace bowling in that match was laughable on both sides
JJ said:I haven't seen the game
lockyno1 said:Hogg always bowls well in ODI cricket! He would not have got smashed like Lewis!
lockyno1 said:You're a kiwi! You need more than a nap!:lol:
aussies1st said:Always? 0/75 ring any bells? http://nz.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2002-03/OD_TOURNEYS/VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_SL_VBS_ODI6_09JAN2003.html
Iafeta said:And you're lockyno1. It goes without saying what you're short of.
El Diablo said:One thing that hasn't been mentioned is Aleem Dar gave Boucher not out when he was plum LBW. It was about his second ball and he was on 0.
Even bloody Donald said he was out. Dar is not fit to umpire.
TheParraboy said:Of course it doesnt get mentioned,
Australia could never possibly receive dud decisions in the eyes of aussie bashers.......
lockyno1 said:Yep and refer to the selective walker Lara for another atrocious decison in Adelaide or Flintoff when he got 100 was plumb for about 10! But no we always get the good decisons!