What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Sticky Ricky the Porky Pie Merchant?

Frank_Grimes

First Grade
Messages
7,023
http://www.nrl.com/i-never-spoke-to...spx?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

NRL referees boss Bill Harrigan has denied telling NSW coach Ricky Stuart after the State of Origin opener that Greg Inglis's controversial try shouldn't have been allowed.
The Daily Telegraph on Thursday reported Stuart as saying Harrigan had admitted that video referee Sean Hampstead should have ruled against Inglis - whose try seven minutes from time helped lift Queensland to their 18-10 win on Wednesday night.
Harrigan said he's taken the issue up with NRL media director John Brady.
"I just finished talking with (Telegraph executive sports editor) Phil Rothfield and now I've left it with John Brady to take it up with Ricky Stuart," Harrigan told radio station Triple M.
"Because I did not speak with Ricky Stuart at all last night."
As for Hampstead's crucial decision - in which he ruled Blues hooker Robbie Farah had deliberately kicked the ball out of Inglis's hands as he attempted to score - Harrigan said he'd have to review the footage carefully before making a definitive comment.
"I still haven't reviewed the game yet and until I get back to Sydney and have a real good look at it (I won't be able to say).
"I can tell you the video referee deems Farah plays it with his foot, the ball comes loose. That means it's a live ball.
"And then when he (Inglis) puts his hands on the ball, that would be a try."
Harrigan also threw his support behind referee Matt Cecchin's decision to sin bin Michael Jennings in the first half for running in to join a brawl and throwing a punch, even though he appeared to be one of several to do so.
"I fully support that. Because he's run in from a long way and thrown a haymaker which has connected.
"So that sinbinning is a good sinbinning.
But Harrigan suggested Cecchin could also have binned Queensland prop Matt Scott for sparking the brawl by throwing the ball into Greg Bird's head.
"The only thing he might have thought about doing a little bit differently, is binning Scotty (Matt Scott) as well.
"Because if he doesn't throw the ball at the back of (Greg) Bird's head - you don't have that situation at all."
However, Harrigan confirmed Stuart's comments that Bird should not have been penalised for a lifting tackle on Cooper Cronk.
"It should have been play on."
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
36,091
This is the same guy that shouldered barged a referee post game whilst coach of Australia, I don't know why his integrity would be questioned?

Thats f**king bullshit, and I think all fans knew it was. Quite a few cockaroaches on here were claiming it was gospel truth.
 

Frank_Grimes

First Grade
Messages
7,023
The article with Sticky's claims:

Referees boss Bill Harrigan admits video ref made a mistake allowing Greg Inglis's try, Ricky Stuart says

New South Wales coach Ricky Stuart has revealed referees boss Bill Harrigan admitted video referee Sean Hampstead should never have awarded Greg Inglis's controversial 73rd-minute try.


Inglis clearly knocked on after the ball ricocheted from Robbie Farah's boot onto the Queensland centre's forearms.
It bounced forward into the Blues' in-goal before Inglis planted the ball.
Yet despite numerous replays, Hampstead awarded the try to Inglis, sealing the 18-10 victory for the Maroons.

"Bill Harrigan admitted that the Inglis try should never have been awarded," Stuart said on Wednesday night.


"And that Greg Bird should not have been penalised for the lifting tackle on Cooper Cronk in the first half."
Stuart also claimed Blues winger Akuila Uate should have been given a penalty when he was elbowed in the head by Cameron Smith.
The questionable decisions followed on from Matt Cecchin's first-half sin-binning of Blues centre Michael Jennings.
Earlier at the post-match press conference, Stuart was reluctant to criticise the referees.
"We won't be commenting on any decision in regards to referees tonight," Stuart said through gritted teeth.
In the wash-up, Jennings was slapped with a grade-one contrary conduct charge for charging in and belting Maroons winger Brent Tate in the back of the head. He will be sidelined for a week regardless of his plea.
Worse still for the Blues, Queensland head to ANZ Stadium on June 13 looking to sweep the series and claim their seventh in a row.
History can wait. But about the Inglis try? With seven minutes to go, with his side holding on to a 12-10 lead, the Maroons freight train was awarded the try.
Gallen detonated when the decision eventually came down.


"This is getting out of control," bellowed the NSW captain. "This is ridiculous where this is getting."
"He's ruled that it's come off the arm or the leg," referee Ben Cummins said to him.
"He f. . .ing dropped the ball," Gallen fumed. "They've had the rub of the green all night. This is out of control. This is ridiculous where this is getting."
Oddly, Stuart said afterwards he believed it was a try.
Was he being sarcastic? Who would know?
"I think it was a try, actually," Stuart said.
"I knew they were going to give it a try.
"They didn't know. They kept having a look at it, but I was very confident they were going to award it."

Maroons prop Matt Scott had sparked the first-half brawl when he threw the ball at lock Greg Bird's head, with players from both sides quickly becoming involved.
Jennings seemingly ran in from interstate, a right-hand haymaker collecting the back of Tate's head.
"It was a silly action," Stuart conceded of Jennings rushing in.
"I won't comment further on that. I wish more people were involved.
"He was the ninth one to run in. A few of them must have popped out of the ground."
Gallen had a running battle with the officials all night, and you can expect a searching inquisition to start as soon as today.
As the players left the field at half-time, the anger of Gallen towards rookie referee Cecchin was palpable. He chased the whistleblower as they left the field and voiced his disapproval at some of his calls.
Stuart's barely veiled rage was not matched by Maroons coach Mal Meninga and his captain Cameron Smith.
Of the Inglis try, Meninga said: "Yes, that's the rules. You can strike at the ball but then it is play on. It was a fair try. Is that the story? Trying to be controversial?"
Meninga described the Jennings punch that led to his sin-binning as a "deliberate act".
Smith agreed: "Jennings came in as the third man and got him in the back of the head."
Said Stuart: "The first six questions you asked Mal were about the referee. Most of you here are experienced rugby league journalists, and have seen a lot of football. Write what Mal and you think."
What did we think? It doesn't really matter. They were two decisions that decided the game.
Doubtless, though, Stuart and his players have searched for years to work out how to beat Queensland.
Now they will think they have to beat the refs, too.

http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/...liss-winning-try/story-fn31yxah-1226365193648
 
Last edited:

Frank_Grimes

First Grade
Messages
7,023
I expect we'll hear more about this. Sticky will either need to back his claims made last night, or admit he made it up.
 

Mong

Post Whore
Messages
55,692
What the?

Why would he make such a claim in the first place if it wasm't actually said, it was always going to end badly.

How many brought into it without any quotes at all from Harrigan?

Has Stuart commented on this again as yet?
 

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
I thought this was a bit suspicious last night when Slothfield was the only one reporting this to be the case.

This seems more like News Ltd. bullshit to me.
 

Frank_Grimes

First Grade
Messages
7,023
The quotes are there from Stick, so if he didn't make the claims contrary to Slothfield's suggestions, the Tele could be sued.

Either way, someone is lying.
 

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
The quotes are there from Stick, so if he didn't make the claims contrary to Slothfield's suggestions, the Tele could be sued.
Hmm, yes you are right.

Since Harrigan's denial seems to be centered around his claim that he never spoke to Ricky, the article doesn't actually specifically mention that Harrigan made the comment directly to Stuart. It could have come through a third party.

It all seems a bit strange. I can't see why Ricky would be saying this after he had earlier agreed with the ruling. Someone has their wires crossed and I am still more inclined to believe this is Slothfield's doing.
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,024
Harrigan is a cancer on the game that needs to be cut out immediately.

I don't care if he did or didn't tell Stuart anything, he is scum.
 

I Bleed Maroon

Referee
Messages
26,176
http://www.triplem.com.au/brisbane/...h-press-conference-in-full/20120524-gdrd.html

This has probably been posted already but I feel it is important enough to warrant its own thread. Bill Harrigan this morning has told the media he "did not speak to Ricky Stuart last night".

So SOMEBODY is lying. How can these two people, whether it be Harrigan or Stuart, get away with blatantly bullshitting to the media? Or is it just the Telegraph clutching at strawsc as they usually do? I'm willing to believe the latter. the Telegraph is a pathetic joke.
 
Messages
14,139
Stuart never said he spoke to Harrigan. It's only Qld tards with the IQ that only generations of inbreeding can produce that are inferring this. Stuart said Harrigan admitted it. Harrigan is saying he didn't now that it has got out. He spoke to Trent Barrett.
 
Top