:lol: that was an accident, because I noticed I didn't give it a capital letter, so I was changing it and accidentally saved it before I replaced the sI preferred this thread when is was called uperthread.
evidently I can.Hala, you cannot unilaterally change a convention that is so old, it is historic in it's very nature.
thank you my subjectI for one welcome our new benevolent overlord
evidently I can.
the convention had to go, whilst BunniesMan's signature is evidence to the fact that BunniesMan is a twat, it is also evidence to the fact that Superhtread numbers are way past their best before dates and they are starting to wreak. It's time that we start thinking of superthreads not individually, but as part of one whole, so that no one can think they have "won" the superthread, but so that they can remember that each superthread is part of the eternal FFB superthread and that winning comes from making the superthread truly super and not by making the most posts any any given 3000 limit part of Superthread.
No.evidently I can.
the convention had to go, whilst BunniesMan's signature is evidence to the fact that BunniesMan is a twat, it is also evidence to the fact that Superhtread numbers are way past their best before dates and they are starting to wreak. It's time that we start thinking of superthreads not individually, but as part of one whole, so that no one can think they have "won" the superthread, but so that they can remember that each superthread is part of the eternal FFB superthread and that winning comes from making the superthread truly super and not by making the most posts any any given 3000 limit part of Superthread.
Still think it should be called threadspace.
This x 1000.Superthread XXXVII and forget about this monstrosity.
Bring back Jess!