What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Superthread XXXVII

Status
Not open for further replies.

BDR

First Grade
Messages
7,526
So ridiculous that he's been stripped without a positive drug test. I love watching cycling but the politics around the sport are ridiculous.
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,540
funny how Lance Arrstrong's medals cannot be awarded retrospectively to the other place getters, as they virtually all be banned for doping

his name has been srtuck form the records so now there are no official winners or place getters

its like the Tour De Frog never happened


Ironically, even if it's not official, that means Cadel "won" the 2005 tour. He finished 8th but everyone above him was doping. Dark days. f**k Armstrong anyway, amazed it took so long to get the cheating merkin
 

Jason Maher

Immortal
Messages
35,991
It doesn't matter what I believe. What matters is no one has ever managed to prove that he doped, despite many, many attempts to do so.
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,540
And yet he's been dine for it and banned for life. That doesn't happen without some modicum of proof, either.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
Anyone who seriously believes he wasn't juicing is blind IMO
Odds are he was probably cheating, but it's unfair to destroy a mans career on a "probably" and on witness testimony drowning in "conflict of interest".

And the people who have done this, will the hundreds of millions less he raises for cancer make them happy? They've banned him in retirement for life with no failed tests, meanwhile cyclists in their primes who actually fail tests get a year or two. It's ridiculous.

He hasn't been treated fairly, he has been singled out and it's unfair.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
And yet he's been dine for it and banned for life. That doesn't happen without some modicum of proof, either.
On witness testimony and circumstantial bullshit. 0 hard evidence.

This wasn't a court of law. This is a sporting body. They had an axe to grind and made it happen.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
It's not unfair. He cheated.
He hasn't been treated like every other cyclist would so it is unfair. And there is no real proof to suggest he cheated.

By that logic your boss could get 10 of your colleagues to say they saw you stealing money from the business. There is no proof you did besides you having a healthy bank account, no video evidence of you cracking open the safe, no impartial hard evidence of you taking the money. But based on witness testimony by people with ulterior motives for saying what they're saying, you're punished.

I bet you wouldn't like that.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
Lol...yeah, they lynched their own shining light for no reason. Jesus you're dumb
He's not their shining light anymore you moron. He's been highly critical of them for years and he's retired now. They had to go for a big fish and nail a big fish to make their sport look legit.

They want people thinking from now and into the future "gee, they even got Lance Armstrong, there can't be any more cheaters in the sport".
 

Jubileeboy

First Grade
Messages
9,259
They wouldn't have got those reviews and sales if they had to rely on their own creativity to make the product and not just cherry pick Steve Jobs' best ideas.

If Samsung thought their product was good enough by itself they never would have done something that ended up costing them a billion dollars in court.

Please jump in front of a train.
Now f##k off genius and do humanity a favour.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,738
Love it when there's 3 games in a day and they don't OVERLAP. That's the most frustrating thing ever.

Pity there's only a combined 2 finals contenders in all 3 games.
 

Didgi

Moderator
Messages
17,260
There has to be some doubt surrounding him, there will always be doubt surrounding this era simply because of the amount of doping that has been proven - though that's not to say it hadn't gone largely undetected for a long time before the last 15 years or so.

However, for a bloke to be handed down the harshest penalty on some very flimsy evidence, by an agency he has criticised and one who has been written off by cycling bodies (not saying they don't have their own motive) deserves the same amount of suspicion.

If Armstrong was cheating, nothing to say the rest of the world's heroes weren't, either, or that a couple of shirty teammates can't ruin a cyclists career. That Cadel in 8th place is the highest legitimate result for '05 could just as easily mean that he's the best at not getting caught - though I'm not alleging that he did cheat, rather it's possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top