It maybe a bit controversial to the old fellas but I think it should be done.
At the moment Newtown wear the "N" emblem on their left breast and have the "Jets" emblem on the sleeve. I think this should be turned around.
I understand the desire to have a past connection. Wests Tigers, Western Bulldogs and Brisbane Lions all have connections with the past on their jerseys but they do not put those connections where the current emblem should be. The "N" is not the current Emblem so it should be where the "Jets" emblem should be.
Newtown sides from 73 to 83 had "Jets on the chest. For all other purposes (match prgrammes, website, other marketing) the "Jets" emblem is the primary tool. Yet it isn't the primary one on the jersey. It doesn't make sense. Newtown has been the Jets for 31 years, they should embrace it.
Another thing, they should move the shoulder emblem higher so that the sleeve sponsor can appear on both sleeves (like a normal sleeve sponsor. Give them credit.)
Opinions please?
At the moment Newtown wear the "N" emblem on their left breast and have the "Jets" emblem on the sleeve. I think this should be turned around.
I understand the desire to have a past connection. Wests Tigers, Western Bulldogs and Brisbane Lions all have connections with the past on their jerseys but they do not put those connections where the current emblem should be. The "N" is not the current Emblem so it should be where the "Jets" emblem should be.
Newtown sides from 73 to 83 had "Jets on the chest. For all other purposes (match prgrammes, website, other marketing) the "Jets" emblem is the primary tool. Yet it isn't the primary one on the jersey. It doesn't make sense. Newtown has been the Jets for 31 years, they should embrace it.
Another thing, they should move the shoulder emblem higher so that the sleeve sponsor can appear on both sleeves (like a normal sleeve sponsor. Give them credit.)
Opinions please?