millersnose
Post Whore
- Messages
- 65,223
our prime minister has to take a lie dectector test everytime some halfwit makes a claim??
:lol:
:lol:
millersnose said:our prime minister has to take a lie dectector test everytime some halfwit makes a claim??
:lol:
0neye said:This is old news get over it all you left wing loonies :roll: VOTE 1 for honest JOHN
There is nothing in there which says they are "illegals".^ Pando said:Seems as though they would be subject to the migration act even if they did land here.
MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 198A
Offshore entry person may be taken to a declared country
(1)
An officer may take an offshore entry person from Australia to a country in respect of which a declaration is in force under subsection (3).
(2)
The power under subsection (1) includes the power to do any of the following things within or outside Australia:
(a) place the person on a vehicle or vessel;
(b) restrain the person on a vehicle or vessel;
(c) remove the person from a vehicle or vessel;
(d) use such force as is necessary and reasonable.
(3)
The Minister may:
(a) declare in writing that a specified country:
(i) provides access, for persons seeking asylum, to effective procedures for assessing their need for protection; and
(ii) provides protection for persons seeking asylum, pending determination of their refugee status; and
(iii) provides protection to persons who are given refugee status, pending their voluntary repatriation to their country of origin or resettlement in another country; and
(iv) meets relevant human rights standards in providing that protection; and
(b) in writing, revoke a declaration made under paragraph (a).
(4)
An offshore entry person who is being dealt with under this section is taken not to be in immigration detention (as defined in subsection 5(1)).
(5)
In this section, officer means an officer within the meaning of section 5, and includes a member of the Australian Defence Force.
By the way, I specifically said that I didn't expect the PM to take the test
andrew flap said:SS asks besides compassion, why?
Because, as I said above, we signed a UN protocol that says we will accept refugees and assess their claims.
Compassion does not enter into it in this instance. You are either a refugee or you are not. It's a legal status, not an emotional decision based upon pity.
The following passages are from Dark Victory by David Marr & Marian Wilkinson
my right eye is openSheros los Deros said:0neye said:This is old news get over it all you left wing loonies :roll: VOTE 1 for honest JOHN
Open up your left eye, oneye, and see the truth.
our prime minister has to take a lie dectector test everytime some halfwit makes a claim??
:lol:
ShireShark said:By the way, I specifically said that I didn't expect the PM to take the test
well then drop it you halfwit!
Lang Park said:Now Scrafton has someone to back his claims :lol: comon gutless Johnny :^o take the polygragh test,what are you scared of? :lol: :lol:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200408/s1178955.htm
Former Defence Department bureaucrat Jenny McKenry has come forward to back the claims of a former ministerial adviser in the children overboard affair.
mickdo said:What exactly is your point?Jimbo said:And of course, the rates the smugglers charge are a pittance compared to other means of transport, aren't they?
JK said:mickdo said:What exactly is your point?Jimbo said:And of course, the rates the smugglers charge are a pittance compared to other means of transport, aren't they?
Jimbo doesn't understand that without papers you have problems boarding a plane or a legitimate boat to get anywhere.
I still can't believe that iraqi refugees (for example) were expected to have papers signed by the Iraqi immigration office or border patrols! Excuse Mr Bloodthirsty Republican Guard, can you please sign here and here and initial there - I'll just jump across the border now :lol:
And this was for refugees from a country you saw fit to invade to change its regime! :lol: :lol: