That's all well and good. You are not the only one that has been saying the club management has problems. No apparent plan for recruitment and retention is obvious from the way things happened again this year.
I agree I would rather see Nuts in the second row off the bench as I think he is far more valuable to us as an impact player and more suited to second row. And I think Hutch is a bench not a starter as well.
Galloway I agree with, Ice is an enigma for me, sometimes great sometimes not. McGoldrick I think should have been on the wing.
If Hilder at 186cm and 101kg is too small then what does that make Gallen? I think Hilders problems at the moment are that he is wounded.
Bailey? I got no idea what his problem is, maybe the way he is used is what has him unhappy and also impacting on his performance.
You left out Simmons, he has scored a few tries but on balance is more liability than he is asset.
We have size in the likes of Williams and I would like to see him up front as he develops. Ross is also a big unit. Loo Loo in the front row (after some work on his defence) could be valuable as well.
I personally believe that the coach has ignored some of the glaring defensive issues that are player based ( around the ruck when Hutch et al are on). We should have been experimenting with the likes of Williams, Manua and Loo Loo up front as we have a fair group of back rowers in Hilder, Bailey, Gallen, Ciraldo, Mellars and (god help me) Bird. In 2006 we should be looking to give the likes of Selmes a run early on (he is a monster and young).
In short I believe our coach failed to do much to fix defensive problems or develop junior talent. If this was because the administration above him would not allow it then the coach is weak.
Frankly, not a lot will change until the administration does and our coach takes charge (assuming he is not responsible for the things that failed to happen this year, as you appear to be saying).